Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorTaylor-robinson, Michelle M.
dc.contributor.authorGeva, Nehemia
dc.contributor.authorStruminger, Rhonda
dc.contributor.authorParas, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T13:10:42Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T13:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-01
dc.identifier.citationRLOP, 1 (2011)
dc.identifier.issn1852-9003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/142640
dc.description.abstractHow do citizens view the work of their legislators? Do they think representatives should legislate and oversee the executive, or do they believe representatives should deliver resources to their community and help individuals with problems? Do they expect both? In Latin America surveys typically show that popular evaluations of the national congress are overwhelmingly negative but are not able to explain why. Are congresses held in low esteem because people think that congress is not legislating well or efficiently overseeing the executive, or because citizens do not know what legislators are supposed to do and want them to deliver pork for their district and personalistic benefits for themselves? Since clientelism targets the poor and plays an important role in elections in developing democ- racies, it is important to know if poor citizens truly have different views than wealthier citizens about what a member of congress should do once elected. We use quasi-experimental procedures in a public opinion survey administered in Mexico City to begin to address these questions. Our findings indicate that poorer citizens, people with no or very little education, have greater expectations of clientelism than wealthier citizens but that their view of a legislator’s job is more subtle, and more democratic than would be predicted by clientelism theory.
dc.description.abstractHow do citizens view the work of their legislators? Do they think representatives should legislate and oversee the executive, or do they believe representatives should deliver resources to their community and help individuals with problems? Do they expect both? In Latin America surveys typically show that popular evaluations of the national congress are overwhelmingly negative but are not able to explain why. Are congresses held in low esteem because people think that congress is not legislating well or efficiently overseeing the executive, or because citizens do not know what legislators are supposed to do and want them to deliver pork for their district and personalistic benefits for themselves? Since clientelism targets the poor and plays an important role in elections in developing democ- racies, it is important to know if poor citizens truly have different views than wealthier citizens about what a member of congress should do once elected. We use quasi-experimental procedures in a public opinion survey administered in Mexico City to begin to address these questions. Our findings indicate that poorer citizens, people with no or very little education, have greater expectations of clientelism than wealthier citizens but that their view of a legislator’s job is more subtle, and more democratic than would be predicted by clientelism theory.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEdiciones Universidad de Salamanca (España)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOpinión pública y encuestas
dc.subjectPublic opinion and polls
dc.title¿Qué deben hacer los miembros del Congreso? Uso de experimentos integrados de encuestas para estudiar las expectativas clientelares de los ciudadanos en México
dc.title.alternativeWhat Should Congress Members Do? Using Survey Embedded Experiments to Study Citizens’ Clientelistic Expectations in Mexico
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée