Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Marcos, Joaquín Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorGalindo Villardón, Purificación 
dc.contributor.authorVicente Galindo, María Purificación 
dc.contributor.authorBravo, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T12:38:22Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T12:38:22Z
dc.date.issued2009-08
dc.identifier.citationMontero, J., López, J. F., Galindo, M. P., Vicente, P., & Bravo, M. (2009). Impact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: a cross-sectional cohort study. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 36(8), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01968.xes_ES
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/154554
dc.description.abstract[EN]To assess the impact of the prosthodontic status on oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction. We performed a cohort study at the University Clinic in Salamanca in which a group requesting prosthetic treatment (P0; n = 31) was compared with a group treated with conventional prostheses (P1; n = 29) and a control group (C; n = 18) not requesting or treated with prostheses. A clinical examination for the presence of caries, periodontal disease and edentulism was carried out. An assessment was made on the impact on the quality of life employing the oral impacts on daily performance-Spanish version and the oral health impact profile 14-Spanish version, and wellbeing was assessed by the self-rated satisfaction on a 0–10 scale. The P0 cohort was significantly less satisfied and suffered a greater level of impact as regard their quality of life than the other cohorts. The main benefit of conventional prosthetic treatment was perceived by most of the treated patients (P1) in dimensions related to chewing, the aesthetic function and the assessment of the general state of the mouth. However, an unexpected proportion of patients underwent a worsening of their oral wellbeing after prosthetic treatment, mainly in the chewing ability (23%) and pain discomfort (19%) dimensions. Satisfaction and quality of life were higher in the treated group (P1) and controls (C) than in those requesting prosthetic treatment (P0).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltdes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOdontologíaes_ES
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life *
dc.subject.meshProsthodontics *
dc.titleImpact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: a cross‐sectional cohort studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01968.xes_ES
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases_ES
dc.subject.unescoOdontologiaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01968.x
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1365-2842
dc.journal.titleJournal of Oral Rehabilitationes_ES
dc.volume.number36es_ES
dc.issue.number8es_ES
dc.page.initial592es_ES
dc.page.final600es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decsodontología protésica *
dc.subject.decscalidad de vida *


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional