Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorPourdarbani, Razieh
dc.contributor.authorSabzi, Sajad
dc.contributor.authorDehghankar, Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorRohban, Mohammad H.
dc.contributor.authorArribas, Juan Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T09:34:06Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T09:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/154687
dc.description.abstractThe presence of bruises on fruits often indicates cell damage, which can lead to a decrease in the ability of the peel to keep oxygen away from the fruits, and as a result, oxygen breaks down cell walls and membranes damaging fruit content. When chemicals in the fruit are oxidized by enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase, the chemical reaction produces an undesirable and apparent brown color effect, among others. Early detection of bruising prevents low-quality fruit from entering the consumer market. Hereupon, the present paper aims at early identification of bruised lemon fruits using 3D-convolutional neural networks (3D-CNN) via a local spectral-spatial hyperspectral imaging technique, which takes into account adjacent image pixel information in both the frequency (wavelength) and spatial domains of a 3D-tensor hyperspectral image of input lemon fruits. A total of 70 sound lemons were picked up from orchards. First, all fruits were labeled and the hyperspectral images (wavelength range 400–1100 nm) were captured as belonging to the healthy (unbruised) class (class label 0). Next, bruising was applied to each lemon by freefall. Then, the hyperspectral images of all bruised samples were captured in a time gap of 8 (class label 1) and 16 h (class label 2) after bruising was induced, thus resulting in a 3-class ternary classification problem. Four well-known 3D-CNN model namely ResNet, ShuffleNet, DenseNet, and MobileNet were used to classify bruised lemons in Python. Results revealed that the highest classification accuracy (90.47%) was obtained by the ResNet model, followed by DenseNet (85.71%), ShuffleNet (80.95%) and MobileNet (73.80%); all over the test set. ResNet model had larger parameter sizes, but it was proven to be trained faster than other models with fewer number of free parameters. ShuffleNet and MobileNet were easier to train and they needed less storage, but they could not achieve a classification error as low as the other two counterparts.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.subjectbruisees_ES
dc.subjectclassificationes_ES
dc.subject3D-CNNes_ES
dc.subjectfruites_ES
dc.subjecthyperspectral imaginges_ES
dc.subjectlemones_ES
dc.subjectmachine learninges_ES
dc.subjecttensor imaginges_ES
dc.titleExamination of Lemon Bruising Using Different CNN-Based Classifiers and Local Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Imaginges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/a16020113
dc.subject.unesco3102 Ingeniería Agrícola
dc.subject.unesco2490 Neurociencias
dc.subject.unesco3306 Ingeniería y Tecnología Eléctricas
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/a16020113
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1999-4893
dc.journal.titleAlgorithmses_ES
dc.volume.number16es_ES
dc.issue.number2es_ES
dc.page.initial113es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige