Título
Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches, systematic review and metanalysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Olfactory
Groove
Meningiomas
Transcranial
Endoscopic
Endonasal
Clasificación UNESCO
32 Ciencias Médicas
3201.01 Oncología
Fecha de publicación
2022
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Roa Montes de Oca, J. C., Gonçalves Estella, J. M., Nieto-Librero, A. B., Galindo-Villardón, P., Roa Ramírez, C. J., Gonçalves Sánchez, J., Berhouma, M., Cornelius, J. F., Daniel, R. T., Zazpe, I., Froelich, S., Jouanneau, E., Mazzatenta, D., Messerer, M., Meling, T., Paraskevopoulos, D., Roche, P.-H., Schroeder, H. W. S., Tatagiba, M., et al. (2022). Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches, systematic review and metanalysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section [Review of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches, systematic review and metanalysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section]. Brain and Spine, 2. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAS.2022.101661
Resumen
[EN] Currently, debate continues regarding the best approach for OGM surgery, and the question remains if there is one approach in particular which can be tailored to these lesions. The goal of the present investigation is, to compare and assess if there are significant differences between the different MTCAs, MITCAs and EEAs, and we set out to weigh and compare clinical and surgical outcomes among the different surgical groups.
URI
ISSN
2772-5294
DOI
10.1016/j.bas.2022.101661
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
