Compartir
Título
A state-of-the-art implementation of a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Binaural sound processing
Speech-in-noise intelligibility
Listening effort
Olivocochlear efferents
Clasificación UNESCO
3213 Cirugía
Fecha de publicación
2021
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Fumero, M. J., Eustaquio-Martín, A., Gorospe, J. M., Polo López, R., Gutiérrez Revilla, M. A., Lassaletta, L., Schatzer, R., Nopp, P., Stohl, J. S., & Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2021). A state-of-the-art implementation of a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex. Hearing Research, 409, 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108320
Resumen
[EN] Cochlear implant (CI) users find it hard and effortful to understand speech in noise with current devices.
Binaural CI sound processing inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex (an approach
termed the ‘MOC strategy’) can improve speech-in-noise recognition for CI users. All reported evaluations
of this strategy, however, disregarded automatic gain control (AGC) and fine-structure (FS) processing,
two standard features in some current CI devices. To better assess the potential of implementing the
MOC strategy in contemporary CIs, here, we compare intelligibility with and without MOC processing in
combination with linked AGC and FS processing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were compared for
an FS and a MOC-FS strategy for sentences in steady and fluctuating noises, for various speech levels, in
bilateral and unilateral listening modes, and for multiple spatial configurations of the speech and noise
sources. Word recall scores and verbal response times in a word recognition test (two proxies for listening
effort) were also compared for the two strategies in quiet and in steady noise at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR) and the individual SRT. In steady noise, mean SRTs were always equal or better with the MOC-FS
than with the standard FS strategy, both in bilateral (the mean and largest improvement across spatial
configurations and speech levels were 0.8 and 2.2 dB, respectively) and unilateral listening (mean and
largest improvement of 1.7 and 2.1 dB, respectively). In fluctuating noise and in bilateral listening, SRTs
were equal for the two strategies. Word recall scores and verbal response times were not significantly
affected by the test SNR or the processing strategy. Results show that MOC processing can be combined
with linked AGC and FS processing. Compared to using FS processing alone, combined MOC-FS processing
can improve speech intelligibility in noise without affecting word recall scores or verbal response times.
URI
ISSN
0378-5955
DOI
10.1016/j.heares.2021.108320
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
Patrocinador
Publicación en abierto financiada por la Universidad de Salamanca como participante en el Acuerdo Transformativo CRUE-CSIC con Elsevier, 2021-2024













