| dc.contributor.author | Molinari Ulate, Mauricio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahmoudi Asl, Aysan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Franco Martín, Manuel Ángel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Van der Roest, Henriëtte | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-10T12:06:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-10T12:06:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Molinari-Ulate, M., Mahmoudi, A., Franco-Martín, M. A., & Van Der Roest, H. G. (2022). Psychometric characteristics of comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) for long-term care facilities and community care: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 81, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1568-1637 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/159497 | |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN] Background: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) have been incorporated as an integrated care
approach effective to face the challenges associated to uncoordinated care, risk of hospitalization, unmet needs,
and care planning experienced in older adult care. As they assessed different dimensions, is important to inform
about the content and psychometric properties to guide the decisions when selecting and implementing them in
practice. This systematic review provides a comprehensive insight on the strengths and weaknesses of the CGAs
used in long-term care settings and community care.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies
published up to July 13, 2021, were considered. Quality appraisal was performed for the included studies.
Results: A total of 10 different CGAs were identified from 71 studies included. Three instruments were reported
for long-term care settings, and seven for community care. The content was not homogenous and differed in
terms of the detail and clearness of the areas being evaluated. Evidence for good to excellent validity and reliability was reported for various instruments.
Conclusions: Setting more specific and clear domains, associated to the special needs of the care setting, could
improve informed decisions at the time of selecting and implementing a CGA. Considering the amount and
quality of the evidence, the instrument development trajectory, the validation in different languages, and
availability in different care settings, we recommend the interRAI LTCF and interRAI HC to be used for long-term
facilities and community care. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Long-term care | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Community care | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Comprehensive geriatric assessment | es_ES |
| dc.subject | CGA | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Reliability | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Validity | es_ES |
| dc.title | Psychometric characteristics of comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) for long-term care facilities and community care: A systematic review | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publishversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 32 Ciencias Médicas | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.journal.title | Ageing Research Reviews | es_ES |
| dc.volume.number | 81 | es_ES |
| dc.page.initial | 1 | es_ES |
| dc.page.final | 9 | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dc.description.project | Publicación en abierto financiada por la Universidad de Salamanca como participante en el Acuerdo Transformativo CRUE-CSIC con Elsevier, 2021-2024 | es_ES |