Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorMolinari Ulate, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorMahmoudi Asl, Aysan
dc.contributor.authorFranco Martín, Manuel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorVan der Roest, Henriëtte
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-10T12:06:46Z
dc.date.available2024-09-10T12:06:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMolinari-Ulate, M., Mahmoudi, A., Franco-Martín, M. A., & Van Der Roest, H. G. (2022). Psychometric characteristics of comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) for long-term care facilities and community care: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 81, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1568-1637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/159497
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) have been incorporated as an integrated care approach effective to face the challenges associated to uncoordinated care, risk of hospitalization, unmet needs, and care planning experienced in older adult care. As they assessed different dimensions, is important to inform about the content and psychometric properties to guide the decisions when selecting and implementing them in practice. This systematic review provides a comprehensive insight on the strengths and weaknesses of the CGAs used in long-term care settings and community care. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies published up to July 13, 2021, were considered. Quality appraisal was performed for the included studies. Results: A total of 10 different CGAs were identified from 71 studies included. Three instruments were reported for long-term care settings, and seven for community care. The content was not homogenous and differed in terms of the detail and clearness of the areas being evaluated. Evidence for good to excellent validity and reliability was reported for various instruments. Conclusions: Setting more specific and clear domains, associated to the special needs of the care setting, could improve informed decisions at the time of selecting and implementing a CGA. Considering the amount and quality of the evidence, the instrument development trajectory, the validation in different languages, and availability in different care settings, we recommend the interRAI LTCF and interRAI HC to be used for long-term facilities and community care.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectLong-term carees_ES
dc.subjectCommunity carees_ES
dc.subjectComprehensive geriatric assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectCGAes_ES
dc.subjectReliabilityes_ES
dc.subjectValidityes_ES
dc.titlePsychometric characteristics of comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) for long-term care facilities and community care: A systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742es_ES
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleAgeing Research Reviewses_ES
dc.volume.number81es_ES
dc.page.initial1es_ES
dc.page.final9es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.description.projectPublicación en abierto financiada por la Universidad de Salamanca como participante en el Acuerdo Transformativo CRUE-CSIC con Elsevier, 2021-2024es_ES


Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional