| dc.contributor.author | Blandón-Gitlin, Iris | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fenn, Elise | |
| dc.contributor.author | Masip Pallejá, Jaume | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yoo, Aspen H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-27T10:56:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-27T10:56:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1364-6613 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/159808 | |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN]A current focus in deception research is on developing
cognitive-load approaches (CLAs) to detect deception.
The aim is to improve lie detection with evidence-based
and ecologically valid procedures. Although these
approaches show great potential, research on cognitive
processes or mechanisms explaining how they operate
is lacking. Potential mechanisms underlying the most
popular techniques advocated for field application are
highlighted. Cognitive scientists are encouraged to conduct
basic research that qualifies the ‘cognitive’ in these
new approaches. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: searching for cognitive mechanisms | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/J.TICS.2014.05.004 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.journal.title | Trends in Cognitive Sciences | es_ES |
| dc.volume.number | 18 | es_ES |
| dc.issue.number | 9 | es_ES |
| dc.page.initial | 441 | es_ES |
| dc.page.final | 444 | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |