Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorBond, Charles F.
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Amanda R.
dc.contributor.authorHutchison, Joanna L.
dc.contributor.authorMasip Pallejá, Jaume 
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-27T10:56:53Z
dc.date.available2024-09-27T10:56:53Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0197-3533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/159810
dc.description.abstract[EN]Over the years, people have searched for deception cues in the liar’s behavior. However, the sender’s incentives to lie might be more revealing than behavior. In Experiment 1, an incentive was developed that was predictive of lying. Judges with access to incentive information in addition to behavior achieved almost perfect lie/truth detection. This was not a result of the speakers’ behavior being transparent (Experiment 2) but because incentive information was useful to separate lies from truths (Experiments 2 and 3). Experiment 3 revealed that people may forego perfectly diagnostic contextual cues to base their judgments on illusory behavioral cues.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleOverlooking the Obvious: Incentives to Liees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01973533.2013.764302
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1532-4834
dc.journal.titleBasic and Applied Social Psychologyes_ES
dc.volume.number35es_ES
dc.issue.number2es_ES
dc.page.initial212es_ES
dc.page.final221es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional