Compartir
Título
NIR Spectroscopy for Discriminating and Predicting the Sensory Profile of Dry-Cured Beef “Cecina”
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Chemometry
Dry meat
Artificial neural networks
Organoleptic parameters
Prediction
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)
Espectroscopía del infrarrojo cercano
Quimiometría
Carne seca
Redes neuronales artificiales
Parámetros organolépticos
Predicción
Protected geographical indication distinguishing (PGI)
Indicación geográfica protegida
Clasificación UNESCO
2209.21 Espectroscopia
1209.14 Técnicas de Predicción Estadística
Fecha de publicación
2020
Editor
MDPI
Citación
Revilla, Isabel, Ana M. Vivar-Quintana, María Inmaculada González-Martín, Miriam Hernández-Jiménez, Iván Martínez-Martín, and Pedro Hernández-Ramos. 2020. "NIR Spectroscopy for Discriminating and Predicting the Sensory Profile of Dry-Cured Beef “Cecina”" Sensors 20, no. 23: 6892. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236892
Resumen
[EN] For Protected Geographical Indication (PGI)-labeled products, such as the dry-cured beef meat “cecina de León”, a sensory analysis is compulsory. However, this is a complex and time-consuming process. This study explores the viability of using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) together with artificial neural networks (ANN) for predicting sensory attributes. Spectra of 50 samples of cecina were recorded and 451 reflectance data were obtained. A feedforward multilayer perceptron ANN with 451 neurons in the input layer, a number of neurons varying between 1 and 30 in the hidden layer, and a single neuron in the output layer were optimized for each sensory parameter. The regression coefficient R squared (RSQ > 0.8 except for odor intensity) and mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) values obtained when comparing predicted and reference values showed that it is possible to predict accurately 23 out of 24 sensory parameters. Although only 3 sensory parameters showed significant differences between PGI and non-PGI samples, the optimized ANN architecture applied to NIR spectra achieved the correct classification of the 100% of the samples while the residual mean squares method (RMS-X) allowed 100% of non-PGI samples to be distinguished.
URI
DOI
10.3390/s20236892
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
- GAPEC. Artículos [71]
Ficheros en el ítem
Tamaño:
527.0Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF












