Compartir
Título
Performance of benchtop and portable spectroscopy equipment for discriminating Iberian ham according to breed
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Iberian breed
Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy
Handheld
Espectroscopia Raman
Raza ibérica
Espectroscopía de infrarrojo cercano (NIR)
Clasificación UNESCO
2209.21 Espectroscopia
Fecha de publicación
2024-01-04
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Hernández-Jiménez, M., Revilla, I., Vivar-Quintana, A. M., Grabska, J., Beć, K. B., & Huck, C. W. (2024). Performance of benchtop and portable spectroscopy equipment for discriminating Iberian ham according to breed. Current research in food science, 8, 100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100675
Resumen
[EN] Iberian ham is a highly appreciated product and according to Spanish legislation different labels identify
different products depending on the genetic purity. Consequently, “100% Iberian” ham from purebred Iberian
animals is more expensive than “Iberian” ham from Iberian x Duroc crosses. The hypothesis of this study was that
to avoid labelling fraud it is possible to distinguish the breed (Iberian or Iberian x Duroc) of acorn-fed pigs of
Iberian ham without any prior preparation of the sample by using spectroscopy that is a rapid and reliable
technology. Moreover, portable devices which can be used in situ could provide similar results to those of
benchtop equipment. Therefore, the spectra of the 60 samples (24 samples of 100% Iberian ham and 36 samples
of Iberian x Duroc crossbreed ham) were recorded only for the fat, only for the muscle, or for the whole slice with
two benchtop near-infrared (NIR) spectrometers (Büchi NIRFlex N-500 and Foss NIRSystem 5000) and five
portable spectrometers including four portable NIR devices (VIAVI MicroNIR 1700 ES, TellSpec Enterprise
Sensor, Thermo Fischer Scientific microPHAZIR, and Consumer Physics SCiO Sensor), and one RAMAN device
(BRAVO handheld). The results showed that, in general, the whole slice recording produced the best results for
classification purposes. The SCiO device showed the highest percentages of correctly classified samples (97% in
calibration and 92% in validation) followed by TellSpec (100% and 81%). The SCiO sensor also showed the
highest percentages of success when the analyses were performed only on lean meat (97% in calibration and 83%
in validation) followed by microPHAZIR (84% and 81%), while in the case of the fat tissue. Raman technology
showed the best discrimination capacity (96% and 78%) followed by microPHAZIR (89% and 81%). Therefore,
spectroscopy has proved to be a suitable technology for discriminating ham samples according to breed purity;
portable devices have been shown to give even better results than benchtop spectrometers.
URI
DOI
10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100675
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
- GAPEC. Artículos [71]
Arquivos deste item
Tamaño:
3.479Mb
Formato:
Adobe PDF
Descripción:
articulo principal












