Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorMontesinos-López, Osval A
dc.contributor.authorMartín Vallejo, Francisco Javier 
dc.contributor.authorCrossa, José
dc.contributor.authorGianola, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Suárez, Carlos M
dc.contributor.authorMontesinos-López, Abelardo
dc.contributor.authorJuliana, Philomin
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ravi
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T09:24:48Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T09:24:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationOsval A Montesinos-López, Javier Martín-Vallejo, José Crossa, Daniel Gianola, Carlos M Hernández-Suárez, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Philomin Juliana, Ravi Singh, A Benchmarking Between Deep Learning, Support Vector Machine and Bayesian Threshold Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Predicting Ordinal Traits in Plant Breeding, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, Volume 9, Issue 2, 1 February 2019, Pages 601–618, https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200998es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/160677
dc.description.abstract[EN]Genomic selection is revolutionizing plant breeding. However, still lacking are better statistical models for ordinal phenotypes to improve the accuracy of the selection of candidate genotypes. For this reason, in this paper we explore the genomic based prediction performance of two popular machine learning methods: the Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM) methods vs. the Bayesian threshold genomic best linear unbiased prediction (TGBLUP) model. We used the percentage of cases correctly classified (PCCC) as a metric to measure the prediction performance, and seven real data sets to evaluate the prediction accuracy, and found that the best predictions (in four out of the seven data sets) in terms of PCCC occurred under the TGLBUP model, while the worst occurred under the SVM method. Also, in general we found no statistical differences between using 1, 2 and 3 layers under the MLP models, which means that many times the conventional neuronal network model with only one layer is enough. However, although even that the TGBLUP model was better, we found that the predictions of MLP and SVM were very competitive with the advantage that the SVM was the most efficient in terms of the computational time required.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherGenetics Society of America. Oxford University Press.es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectThresholdes_ES
dc.subjectGBLUPes_ES
dc.subjectDeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectSupport vector machinees_ES
dc.subjectGenomic selectiones_ES
dc.subjectPlant breedinges_ES
dc.subjectGenomic Predictiones_ES
dc.subjectGenPredes_ES
dc.subjectShared Data Resourceses_ES
dc.titleA Benchmarking Between Deep Learning, Support Vector Machine and Bayesian Threshold Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Predicting Ordinal Traits in Plant Breedinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200998es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1534/g3.118.200998
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2160-1836
dc.journal.titleG3 Genes|Genomes|Geneticses_ES
dc.volume.number9es_ES
dc.issue.number2es_ES
dc.page.initial601es_ES
dc.page.final618es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional