Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorEuropean Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group
dc.contributor.authorGlasbey, J.
dc.contributor.authorNepogodiev, D.
dc.contributor.authorAlcázar Montero, José Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorAngoso Clavijo, María 
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T19:06:10Z
dc.date.available2024-12-10T19:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationthe 2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group. (2018). The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right‐sided colorectal resection: An international multicentre, prospective audit. Colorectal Disease, 20(11), 1028-1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14308es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1462-8910
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/161042
dc.description.abstract[EN]There is little evidence to support choice of technique and configuration for stapled anastomoses after right hemicolectomy and ileocaecal resection. This study aimed to determine the relationship between stapling technique and anastomotic failure. Any unit performing gastrointestinal surgery was invited to contribute data on consecutive adult patients undergoing right hemicolectomy or ileocolic resection to this prospective, observational, international, multicentre study. Patients undergoing stapled, side-to-side ileocolic anastomoses were identified and multilevel, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore factors associated with anastomotic leak. One thousand three hundred and forty-seven patients were included from 200 centres in 32 countries. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 8.3%. Upon multivariate analysis there was no difference in leak rate with use of a cutting stapler for apical closure compared with a noncutting stapler (8.4% vs 8.0%, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54-1.53, P = 0.72). Oversewing of the apical staple line, whether in the cutting group (7.9% vs 9.7%, OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52-1.46, P = 0.60) or noncutting group (8.9% vs 5.7%, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.46-4.23, P = 0.55) also conferred no benefit in terms of reducing leak rates. Surgeons reporting to be general surgeons had a significantly higher leak rate than those reporting to be colorectal surgeons (12.1% vs 7.3%, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.04-2.64, P = 0.04). This study did not identify any difference in anastomotic leak rates according to the type of stapling device used to close the apical aspect. In addition, oversewing of the anastomotic staple lines appears to confer no benefit in terms of reducing leak rates. Although general surgeons operated on patients with more high-risk characteristics than colorectal surgeons, a higher leak rate for general surgeons which remained after risk adjustment needs further exploration.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBowel anastomosises_ES
dc.subjectStapleres_ES
dc.subjectOversewnes_ES
dc.subjectSurgi-cal techniquees_ES
dc.subjectAnastomotic leakes_ES
dc.subjectColorectal canceres_ES
dc.subjectCrohn’s diseasees_ES
dc.subjectEpidemiologyes_ES
dc.subjectSurgeryes_ES
dc.subject.meshAged *
dc.subject.meshSurgical Stapling *
dc.subject.meshColon *
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult *
dc.subject.meshColorectal Surgery *
dc.subject.meshAdult *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshAdolescent *
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged *
dc.subject.meshGeneral Surgery *
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies *
dc.subject.meshColectomy *
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms *
dc.subject.meshAnastomotic Leak *
dc.subject.meshTreatment Failure *
dc.titleThe impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audites_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14308es_ES
dc.subject.unesco3213 Cirugíaes_ES
dc.subject.unesco3207.13 Oncologíaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.14308
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.pmid29920945
dc.identifier.essn1463-1318
dc.journal.titleColorectal diseasees_ES
dc.volume.number20es_ES
dc.issue.number11es_ES
dc.page.initial1028es_ES
dc.page.final1040es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decshumanos *
dc.subject.decsanciano *
dc.subject.decsneoplasias colorrectales *
dc.subject.decsmediana edad *
dc.subject.decsadolescente *
dc.subject.decsestudios prospectivos *
dc.subject.decsadulto *
dc.subject.decsadulto joven *
dc.subject.decscirugía colorrectal *
dc.subject.decscolon *
dc.subject.decsgrapado quirúrgico *
dc.subject.decscolectomía *
dc.subject.decsfracaso del tratamiento *
dc.subject.decscirugía general *
dc.subject.decsfuga anastomótica *


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional