Compartir
Título
Substrate ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Catheter ablation
Amiodarone
Ventricular tachycardia
Fecha de publicación
2022-04-19
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Arenal, Á., Ávila, P., Jiménez-Candil, J., Tercedor, L., Calvo, D., Arribas, F., Fernández-Portales, J., Merino, J. L., Hernández-Madrid, A., Fernández-Avilés, F. J., & Berruezo, A. (2022). Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 79(15), 1441-1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2022.01.050
Resumen
[EN]In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) reduce ICD shocks, but the most effective approach remains uncertain.
This trial compares the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation vs AAD as first-line therapy in ICD patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardias (VTs).
The SURVIVE-VT (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and appropriated ICD shock. Patients were 1:1 randomized to complete endocardial substrate-based catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic therapy (amiodarone + beta-blockers, amiodarone alone, or sotalol ± beta-blockers). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications.
In this trial, 144 patients (median age, 70 years; 96% male) were randomized to catheter ablation (71 patients) or AAD (73 patients). After 24 months, the primary outcome occurred in 28.2% of patients in the ablation group and 46.6% of those in the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90; P = 0.021). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in severe treatment-related complications (9.9% vs 28.8%, HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.71; P = 0.006). Eight patients were hospitalized for heart failure in the ablation group and 13 in the AAD group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.23-1.35; P = 0.198). There was no difference in cardiac mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.19-4.61; P = 0.929).
In ICD patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and symptomatic VT, catheter ablation reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, hospitalization due to heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications compared to AAD. (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia [SURVIVE-VT]: NCT03734562).
URI
ISSN
0735-1097
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.050
Versión del editor
Collections
Files in this item
Nombre:
Tamaño:
894.6Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF
Descripción:
Artículo principal, versión final













