Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Iván
dc.contributor.authorColmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorPérez González, David 
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Venezia G.
dc.contributor.authorPlaza Lopez, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorMerchán Cifuentes, Miguel Ángel 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T17:49:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-14T17:49:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationDíaz I, Colmenarez-Raga AC, Pérez-González D, Carmona VG, Plaza Lopez I and Merchán MA (2021) Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat. Front. Neurosci. 15:642047es_ES
dc.identifier.citationDíaz, I., Colmenárez-Raga, A. C., Pérez-González, D., Carmona, V. G., Plaza Lopez, I., y Merchán, M. A. (2021). Effects of multisession anodal electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex on temporary noise-induced hearing loss in the rat. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 642047. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/161782
dc.description.abstractThe protective effect of the efferent system against acoustic trauma (AT) has been shown by several experimental approaches, including damage to one ear, sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) in the floor of the IV ventricle, and knock-in mice overexpressing outer hair cell (OHC) cholinergic receptors, among others. Such effects have been related to changes in the regulation of the cholinergic efferent system and in cochlear amplification, which ultimately reverse upon protective hearing suppression. In addition to well-known circuits of the brainstem, the descending corticofugal pathway also regulates efferent neurons of the olivary complex. In this study, we applied our recently developed experimental paradigm of multiple sessions of electrical stimulation (ES) to activate the efferent system in combination with noise overstimulation. ABR thresholds increased 1 and 2 days after AT (8–16 kHz bandpass noise at 107 dB for 90 min) recovering at AT + 14 days. However, after multiple sessions of epidural anodal stimulation, no changes in thresholds were observed following AT. Although an inflammatory response was also observed 1 day after AT in both groups, the counts of reactive macrophages in both experimental conditions suggest decreased inflammation in the epidural stimulation group. Quantitative immunocytochemistry for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) showed a significant decrease in the size and optical density of the efferent terminals 1 day after AT and a rebound at 14 days, suggesting depletion of the terminals followed by a long-term compensatory response. Such a synthesis recovery was significantly higher upon cortical stimulation. No significant correlation was found between ChAT optical density and size of the buttons in sham controls (SC) and ES/AT + 1day animals; however, significant negative correlations were shown in all other experimental conditions. Therefore, our comparative analysis suggests that cochleotopic cholinergic neurotransmission is also better preserved after multisession epidural stimulation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Salamanca Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government SAF2016-78898-C2-2-R and BFU2017-82375-R Junta de Castilla y León - JCYL SA070P17es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.rights.uriAttribution-4.0 Internacional*
dc.subjectcorti organes_ES
dc.subjectauditory brainstem responseses_ES
dc.subjectquantitative immunocytochemistryes_ES
dc.subjectcholine acetyl transferasees_ES
dc.subjectepidural anodal direct current stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectcochlear inflammatory responsees_ES
dc.subjectcochleotopyes_ES
dc.titleEffects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rates_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047/fulles_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
dc.relation.projectIDSAF2016-78898-C2-2-Res_ES
dc.relation.projectIDBFU2017-82375-Res_ES
dc.relation.projectIDSA070P17es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.audience.educationLevel
dc.identifier.essn1662-453X
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Neurosciencees_ES
dc.volume.number15es_ES
dc.page.initial642047es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.description.projectUniversity of Salamancaes_ES
dc.description.projectMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Governmentes_ES
dc.description.projectJunta de Castilla y León - JCYLes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem