Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFonseca-Pérez, Rosa María
dc.contributor.authorAlmena, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorRamírez-Márquez, César
dc.contributor.authorBonilla-Petriciolet, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martín, Mariano 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T09:08:37Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T09:08:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.identifier.citationRosa María Fonseca-Pérez, Alberto Almena, César Ramírez-Márquez, Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet, Mariano Martín, Techno-economic and environmental comparison of processes for the production of grape oil, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 441, 2024, 141041, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141041. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624004888)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/162115
dc.description.abstract[EN] A systematic techno-economic analysis for the comparison of different routes for grape seed oil extraction was performed, which included hexane extraction as benchmark process, and the use of supercritical fluids (SC), specifically SC-CO2 and SC-CO2+ethanol as co-solvent. The processes have been modeled rigorously using Aspen Plus. The results show that the use of hexane is the most efficient (13.06 % recovery) and, only by using a co-solvent together with SC-CO2, the yield is similar (12.98 %). However, the cost increases from 6.31 USD/kg of extracted grape oil to 8.61 USD/kg of oil extracted, even though it is cheaper than the use of SC-CO2 alone. The investment cost is almost twice using the co-solvent compared to the traditional one ($9.72 MM vs $4.95 MM). SimaPro has been used to perform the lifecycle assessment (LCA). Similar results are found when the LCA analysis is performed as long as the energy mix is the current one. The high energy consumption of SC based systems results in high carbon emissions. However, combining electrification and renewable energy allowed the SC-CO2+ethanol system to reduce by 25 % the CO2 emissions per kg of oil produced by the hexane system. The economic evaluation performed provides the estimation of the CAPEX and OPEX for each alternative.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectWaste valorizationes_ES
dc.subjectProcess simulationes_ES
dc.subjectSupercritical fluidses_ES
dc.subjectTechno-economic analysises_ES
dc.subjectLifecycle assessmentes_ES
dc.titleTechno-economic and environmental comparison of processes for the production of grape oiles_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141041es_ES
dc.subject.unesco3303 Ingeniería y Tecnología Químicases_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141041
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/319454/EUes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDUSALForexcellencees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cleaner Productiones_ES
dc.volume.number441es_ES
dc.page.initial141041es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional