| dc.contributor.author | Martín Sánchez, Carlos | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barbero Iglesias, Fausto José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amor Esteban, Víctor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martín Nogueras, Ana María | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-23T08:28:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-23T08:28:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0304-324X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162319 | |
| dc.description | This is the peer-reviewed but unedited manuscript version of the following article: Martin-Sanchez, C., Barbero-Iglesias, F. J., Amor-Esteban, V., & Martin-Nogueras, A. M. (2021). Comparison between two inspiratory muscle training protocols, low loads versus high loads, in institutionalized elderly women: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Gerontology, 67(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000511009. The final, published version is available at: https://karger.com/ger/article-abstract/67/1/1/147824/Comparison-between-Two-Inspiratory-Muscle-Training?redirectedFrom=fulltext | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN] Background: Aging results in a decline in the function of the respiratory muscles. Inspiratory muscle training is presented as a possible solution to attenuate the loss of respiratory function in the elderly. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 2 protocols with inspiratory muscle training (IMT), low loads and high loads, to improve respiratory strength, functional capacity and dyspnea in institutionalized elderly women, over 65 years. Methods: The study was a controlled, randomized, double-blind trial and with allocation concealment performed on 26 institutionalized elderly women distributed in 2 groups, the high-intensity group (HIG) and low-intensity group (LIG). Over an 8-week period an IMT protocol was followed 5 days/week, 15 min/day. The HIG trained with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the LIG with 20%. MIP, maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), functional capacity and dyspnea were evaluated. Results: After training, in the HIG MIP, MEP and functional capacity increased 52, 16 and 7%, respectively (p = 0.000, p = 0.001, p = 0.001) and in the LIG 30, 18 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.002, p = 0.014, p = 0.001). The improvement in MIP was significantly higher in the HIG than in the LIG (p = 0.042). Conclusion: IMT with low and high loads improves respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in institutionalized elderly women. In addition, high loads were significantly more effective to improve MIP. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Karger | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | HJ-Biplot | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Aging | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Elderly | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Exercise training | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Muscle training | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Rehabilitation | es_ES |
| dc.title | Comparison between Two Inspiratory Muscle Training Protocols, Low Loads versus High Loads, in Institutionalized Elderly Women: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/10.1159/000511009 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 1209.09 Análisis Multivariante | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 1209.13 Técnicas de Inferencia Estadística | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 3205.08 Enfermedades Pulmonares | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000511009 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.essn | 1423-0003 | |
| dc.journal.title | Gerontology | es_ES |
| dc.volume.number | 67 | es_ES |
| dc.issue.number | 1 | es_ES |
| dc.page.initial | 1 | es_ES |
| dc.page.final | 8 | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es_ES |
Parcourir
Tout GredosCommunautés & CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitresCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres
Mon compte
Statistiques
ENLACES Y ACCESOS
Derechos de autorPolíticasGuías de autoarchivoFAQAdhesión USAL a la Declaración de BerlínProtocolo de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datosSolicitud de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datos








