Compartir
Título
Comparison of the effects of quetiapine extended-release and quetiapine immediate-release on cognitive performance, sedation and patient satisfaction in patients with schizophrenia: A randomised, double-blind, crossover study (eXtRa)
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Quetiapine extended release
Quetiapine immediate release
Daytime cognitive function
Stable schizophrenia
Treatment satisfaction
Clasificación UNESCO
3201.05 Psicología Clínica
Fecha de publicación
2015
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Riedel, M., Schmitz, M., Østergaard, P. K., Ferrannini, L., Franco, M. A., Alfano, V., Vansvik, E. D., Riedel, M., Schmitz, M., Østergaard, P. K., Ferrannini, L., Franco, M. A., Alfano, V., & Vansvik, E. D. (2015). Comparison of the effects of quetiapine extended-release and quetiapine immediate-release on cognitive performance, sedation and patient satisfaction in patients with schizophrenia: A randomised, double-blind, crossover study (eXtRa). Schizophrenia Research, 162(1-3), Article 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCHRES.2014.12.027
Resumen
[EN]Objectives: To assess daytime cognitive performance, sedation and treatment satisfaction in patients with schizophrenia
receiving quetiapine extended release (XR) versus quetiapine immediate release (IR).
Methods: Phase IV prospective, double-blind, crossover study (NCT01213836). Patients (N = 66) with stable
schizophrenia, treated with XR or IR before study start, were randomised (1:1) to treatment with XR followed
by IR, or IR followed by XR, at the dose received before enrolment (400–750 mg). After 10–16 days on formulation
1, patients switched to formulation 2. Assessments fromthree post-dose visits (≥5 days following treatment
on each formulation) were analysed. Cognitive performance was measured by CogState Cognition testing.
Sedation, treatment satisfaction and safety were also assessed.
Results: 65 patients received treatment (69.2% male; mean age 37.8 years). Daytime cognitive functioning was
similar for both groups; adjusted mean difference in Attentional Composite Score in XR and IR patients was
0.005 (p = 0.907). Patients receiving XR were less sedated than those receiving IR, (Bond–Lader visual
analogue scale score, mean [SD]: 23.5 [19.0] vs 28.6 [21.4]); estimated overall treatment difference: 5.2
(95% CI: 2.3, 8.2; p b 0.0009). Patients receiving XR reported feeling less sedated than those on IR (Stanford
Sleepiness Scale, mean [SD]: 2.4 [0.9] vs 2.6 [1.0]); estimated overall treatment difference: 0.28 (95% CI:
0.12, 0.43; p b 0.0008). Patients reported improved overall treatment satisfaction (p = 0.0417) and milder
side effects (p = 0.0035) with XR. Safety profile was similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Daytime cognitive performance was similar for both groups. XR was associated with less daytime
sedation and improved patient satisfaction than IR.
URI
ISSN
0920-9964
DOI
10.1016/J.SCHRES.2014.12.027
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
Tamaño:
737.8Ko
Formato:
Adobe PDF













