Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPetrollese, Mario
dc.contributor.authorMarchionni, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorMerchán Corral, Rosa Pilar 
dc.contributor.authorMigliari, Luca
dc.contributor.authorCau, Giorgio
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T12:51:39Z
dc.date.available2025-02-19T12:51:39Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationMario Petrollese, Matteo Marchionni, Rosa P. Merchán, Luca Migliari, Giorgio Cau, Comparative analysis of different Rankine PTES system configurations, Journal of Energy Storage, Volume 114, Part B, 2025, 115800, ISSN 2352-152X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.115800. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25005134)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2352-152X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/163839
dc.description.abstract[EN]In this paper, four main configurations of a Rankine-based Pumped Thermal Energy Storage (PTES) system are proposed and compared in terms of achievable electrical and exergy roundtrip efficiency and energy density. The analysis considers a conventional setup employing commercial heat pumps and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems integrated with a Thermal Energy Storage (TES) unit as reference. The initial findings indicate that offthe- shelf systems result in roundtrip efficiencies lower than 40%, even under optimal high-temperature conditions at the heat pump evaporator inlet. This is primarily due to significant exogenous exergy destructions inherent in the commercial equipment. The study then explores upgraded alternatives to the reference PTES configuration, focusing on optimizing the heat pump layout and selecting non-conventional working fluids. This optimization process includes evaluating various working fluids, where n-hexane is identified as the optimal choice for achieving the highest electrical and exergy roundtrip efficiencies, particularly at evaporator inlet temperatures above 60◦C. For lower temperature ranges, acetone emerges as a more suitable fluid due to its favorable thermodynamic properties. Further enhancements are made by optimizing the ORC layout, specifically through the introduction of an additional thermal storage tank and improved heat exchangers. These modifications are aimed at minimizing heat transfer losses and thereby boosting the overall system performance. With these changes, the PTES system's roundtrip efficiency reaches approximately 70%. The most advanced configuration integrates the heat pump and ORC systems into a single assembly, utilizing the working fluid not only for energy transfer but also as a storage medium. This integration reduces the number of required components and further increases efficiency. As a result, roundtrip efficiencies of about 80% are achieved, representing a significant advancement over current commercial systems.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEnergy storagees_ES
dc.subjectPumped thermal energy storagees_ES
dc.subjectOrganic Rankinees_ES
dc.subjectExergyes_ES
dc.titleComparative analysis of different Rankine PTES system configurationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.115800es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.est.2025.115800
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleJournal of Energy Storagees_ES
dc.volume.number114es_ES
dc.page.initial115800es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional