Compartir
Título
Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Quality of life
Students with disabilities
Higher education
Educational practices
Inclusion
Clasificación UNESCO
61 Psicología
5802 Organización y Planificación de la Educación
6306.05 Sociología de la Educación
Fecha de publicación
2024
Editor
Elsevier
Citación
Gonzalo, Ó., Heras, I., Castillo, J. L., Meza, C., & Verdugo, M. Á. (2024). Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 154, 104850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850
Resumen
[EN] Background: The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for
enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at
assessing its impact has been identified.
Aims: This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on
higher education.
Methods and procedures: A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed
at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from
EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish
from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.
Outcomes and results: Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with develop
mental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported
educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-
ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized
supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated
settings.
Conclusions and implications: This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in
fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic
review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.
URI
ISSN
0891-4222
DOI
10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones













