Compartir
Título
Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
LocoMMotion
MoMMent
MonumenTAL-1
Talquetamab
Triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Clasificación UNESCO
3201.01 Oncología
3207.13 Oncología
Fecha de publicación
2024
Editor
Springer
Citación
Alcalde-Eon, C., Escribano-Bailón, M.-T., & García-Estévez, I. (2024). Ability of different flavonols and commercial mannoproteins to enhance wine colour through copigmentation. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2024(1), 6822967. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6822967
Resumen
[EN] Introduction: Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody
targeting GPRC5D 9 CD3, is approved for
the treatment of patients with triple-class -
exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple
myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the results
from the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 trial. The
relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. realworld
physician’s choice of therapy (RWPC) was
assessed using adjusted comparisons.
Methods: An external control arm for MonumenTAL-
1 (subcutaneously administered talquetamab
0.4 mg/kg weekly [QW] and 0.8 mg/
kg every other week [Q2W]) was created from
two observational real-world studies: LocoMMotion
and MoMMent. Imbalances in baseline
covariates were adjusted using inverse probability
weighting. The relative effectiveness of
talquetamab vs. RWPC was estimated for overall
response rate (ORR), C very good partial
response (VGPR), and C complete response (CR); odds ratios and relative response ratios
(RRs) were derived from weighted logistic
regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) for duration of
response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS),
time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall
survival (OS) were estimated using a weighted
Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: After reweighting, baseline characteristics
were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted
comparisons, patients treated with talquetamab
QW (n = 143) had significantly improved outcomes
vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.67,
p\0.0001; C VGPR 4.70, p\0.0001; C CR
78.05, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.52,
p\0.0001; TTNT 0.48, p\0.0001; OS 0.36,
p\0.0001. Patients treated with talquetamab
Q2W (n = 145) also had significantly improved
outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.62,
p\0.0001; C VGPR 5.04, p\0.0001; C CR
101.14, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.40,
p\0.0001; TTNT 0.39, p\0.0001; OS 0.37,
p\0.0001.
Conclusion: Effectiveness of talquetamab for
both schedules was significantly better than
RWPC for ORR, C VGPR, C CR, PFS, OS, and
TTNT, highlighting its clinical benefit for
patients with TCE RRMM.
Trial Registration: MonumenTAL-1, ClinicalTrials.
gov identifier NCT03399799/
NCT04634552; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.-
gov identifier NCT04035226; MoMMent, ClinicalTrials.
gov identifier NCT05160584.
Keywords: LocoMMotion; MoMMent;
MonumenTAL-1; Talquetamab; Triple-classexposed
relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Descripción
Financiación de acceso abierto proporcionada por los Fondos Europeos FEDER y la Junta de Castilla y León en el marco de la Estrategia de Investigación e Innovación para la Especialización Inteligente (RIS3) de Castilla y León 2021-2027
URI
ISSN
0741-238X
DOI
10.1007/s12325-024-02797-x
Versión del editor
Collections
Files in this item
Nombre:
Tamaño:
501.0Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF
Descripción:
Suplemento al artículo














