Compartir
Título
The influence of peri-implant mucosal phenotype on marginal bone changes in single-tooth implants with direct restorations: a 36-month clinical trial
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
DENTAL IMPLANTS
MARGINAL BONE LOSS
PHENOTYPE
Fecha de publicación
2025-09-10
Editor
ELSEVIER
Citación
Quispe-López, N., Gómez-Polo, C., Flores-Fraile, J., Figueras-Álvarez, O., Muñoz-Bruguier, M., López-Valverde, N., & Montero, J. (2025). The influence of peri-implant mucosal phenotype on marginal bone changes in single-tooth implants with direct restorations: a 36-month clinical trial. Journal of dentistry, 163, 106100.
Resumen
[EN]Objectives: : This clinical trial aimed to evaluate changes at the marginal bone level by analysing the influence of
the peri‑implant mucosal phenotype on implants restored with direct screw-retained prostheses after a 3-year
follow-up.
Methods: Fifty-one patients received 56 implants in the posterior part of the maxilla or mandible. The implants
were placed equicrestally, 1 mm subcrestally (SC), or > 1 mm SC, depending on the initial supracrestal tissue
height (STH). After 3 months of non-submerged healing, screw-retained single-unit crowns were placed in direct
connection with the implant shoulder. Clinical (STH, mucosal thickness, and keratinised mucosa width, KMW)
and radiographic (marginal bone remodelling and marginal bone loss, MBR and MBL, respectively) data were
recorded during the implant placement surgery (T0) and at the 3, 6, 12, and 36-month follow-ups (T1–T4). MBL
was considered the main variable in this work.
Results: There was a significant reduction in the mean KMW (by 0.3 ± 0.7 mm) between the 12 and 36-month
follow-up (p = .001). After 36 months, significant MBR had occurred between the T3 and T4 periods (0.15 ±
0.29 mm; p = .001), however there had also been some non-significant MBL. Implants with SC positioning > 1
mm showed the highest MBR levels, while equicrestal implants showed the highest MBL. Multiple linear
regression analysis indicated that MBR is driven chiefly by implant length, implant diameter and the implant’s
apico-coronal position, whereas MBL depends mainly on KMW and implant diameter.
Conclusions: Implant crestal position, implant diameter, and keratinised mucosal width were the most important
factors in marginal peri‑implant bone loss.
URI
ISSN
0300-5712
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106100
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
Ficheros en el ítem
Tamaño:
6.204Mb
Formato:
Adobe PDF













