Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorAbat, F
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Sánchez, José Luis 
dc.contributor.authorMartín Nogueras, Ana María 
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Arenillas, José Ignacio 
dc.contributor.authorYajeya Pérez, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Sánchez, Roberto 
dc.contributor.authorMonllau, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorGelber, P.E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-30T12:22:37Z
dc.date.available2025-10-30T12:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2197-1153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/167568
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy. Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherhttps://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectUSGETes_ES
dc.subjectGalvanices_ES
dc.subjectElectrolysises_ES
dc.subjectTreatmentes_ES
dc.subjectPatellares_ES
dc.subjectTendinopathyes_ES
dc.subjectElectrophysiotherapyes_ES
dc.subjectElectrólisis Ecoguiadaes_ES
dc.subjectTratamientoes_ES
dc.subjectTendinopatíaes_ES
dc.subjectElectrofisioterapiaes_ES
dc.subject.meshTendinopathy *
dc.titleRandomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound‐guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro‐physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/S40634-016-0070-4es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/S40634-016-0070-4
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2197-1153
dc.journal.titleJournal of Experimental Orthopaedicses_ES
dc.volume.number3es_ES
dc.issue.number1es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decstendinopatía *


Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional