| dc.contributor.author | Quispe López, Norberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Santos, Juan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Delgado-Gregori, Joaquín | |
| dc.contributor.author | López-Malla Matute, Joaquín | |
| dc.contributor.author | López-Valverde Hernández, Nansi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Flores Fraile, Javier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez Polo, Cristina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Montero Martín, Javier | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-12T12:30:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-12T12:30:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Quispe-López, N., Sánchez-Santos, J., Delgado-Gregori, J., López-Malla Matute, J., López-Valverde, N., Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., ... & Montero, J. (2022). Double Lateral Sliding Bridge Flap versus Laterally Closed Tunnel for the Treatment of Single Recessions in the Mandibular Anterior Teeth: A Pseudorandomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(10), 2918. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/167811 | |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN]This study compard the clinical and esthetic results of the double lateralsliding bridge flap (DLSBF) and the laterally closed tunnel (LCT) techniques, with a subepithelial con-nective tissue graft (SCTG), for the treatment of single Miller class II-III recessions in the mandibularanterior teeth. (2) Methods: This pseudorandomized clinical trial evaluated 14 patients, 7 of whomwere part of the DLSBF + SCTG group, with an average follow-up of 58.7 ± 24.0 months, and 7 ofwhom were in the LCT + SCTG group, with an average follow-up of 16.7 ± 3.3 months. Clinical andesthetic evaluations of the following parameters were performed and the results for the two groupswere compared: gingival recession depth, probing depth, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness,percentage of root coverage and root coverage esthetic score. (3) Results: After the follow-up period,each technique provided evidence of a reduction in recession depth and clinical attachment level,as well as increased keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness, with statistically significantdifferences (p < 0.05). The analysis showed that gingival recession depth decreased less in the DLSBFgroup (4.3 ± 1.2 mm to 0.6 ± 1.1 mm) than it did in the LCT group (4.9 ± 1.1 mm to 0.1 ± 0.4 mm),but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Similarly, a greater reduction inthe clinical attachment level parameter was observed in the LCT group, while a greater increase ingingival thickness was observed in the DLSBF group. The presence of scars was the only parameterfor which statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two study groups were found.(4) Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it indicates that the LCT + SCTG techniquemay be considered an optimal technique in terms of reducing gingival recession depth, completeroot coverage and esthetic results for the treatment of single gingival recessions in the mandibularanterior! teeth. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | root coverage | es_ES |
| dc.subject | esthetics | es_ES |
| dc.subject | mandibular anterior teeth | es_ES |
| dc.subject | double lateral sliding bridge flap | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Connective Tissue | * |
| dc.subject.mesh | Gingival Recession | * |
| dc.subject.mesh | Gingival Retraction Techniques | * |
| dc.title | Double lateral sliding bridge flap versus laterally closed tunnel for the treatment of single recessions in the mandibular anterior teeth: A pseudorandomized clinical trial | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/ 10.3390/JCM11102918 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/JCM11102918 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.essn | 2077-0383 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Clinical Medicine | es_ES |
| dc.volume.number | 11 | es_ES |
| dc.issue.number | 10 | es_ES |
| dc.page.initial | 2918 | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es_ES |
| dc.subject.decs | tejido conectivo | * |
| dc.subject.decs | recesión gingival | * |
| dc.subject.decs | técnicas de retracción gingival | * |
Browse
All of GredosCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitles
My Account
Statistics
ENLACES Y ACCESOS
Derechos de autorPolíticasGuías de autoarchivoFAQAdhesión USAL a la Declaración de BerlínProtocolo de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datosSolicitud de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datos








