Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuispe López, Norberto 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Santos, Juan
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Gregori, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Malla Matute, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Valverde Hernández, Nansi 
dc.contributor.authorZubizarreta Macho, Álvaro 
dc.contributor.authorFlores Fraile, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorGómez Polo, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-12T12:30:28Z
dc.date.available2025-11-12T12:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationQuispe-López, N., Sánchez-Santos, J., Delgado-Gregori, J., López-Malla Matute, J., López-Valverde, N., Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., ... & Montero, J. (2022). Double Lateral Sliding Bridge Flap versus Laterally Closed Tunnel for the Treatment of Single Recessions in the Mandibular Anterior Teeth: A Pseudorandomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(10), 2918.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/167811
dc.description.abstract[EN]This study compard the clinical and esthetic results of the double lateralsliding bridge flap (DLSBF) and the laterally closed tunnel (LCT) techniques, with a subepithelial con-nective tissue graft (SCTG), for the treatment of single Miller class II-III recessions in the mandibularanterior teeth. (2) Methods: This pseudorandomized clinical trial evaluated 14 patients, 7 of whomwere part of the DLSBF + SCTG group, with an average follow-up of 58.7 ± 24.0 months, and 7 ofwhom were in the LCT + SCTG group, with an average follow-up of 16.7 ± 3.3 months. Clinical andesthetic evaluations of the following parameters were performed and the results for the two groupswere compared: gingival recession depth, probing depth, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness,percentage of root coverage and root coverage esthetic score. (3) Results: After the follow-up period,each technique provided evidence of a reduction in recession depth and clinical attachment level,as well as increased keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness, with statistically significantdifferences (p < 0.05). The analysis showed that gingival recession depth decreased less in the DLSBFgroup (4.3 ± 1.2 mm to 0.6 ± 1.1 mm) than it did in the LCT group (4.9 ± 1.1 mm to 0.1 ± 0.4 mm),but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Similarly, a greater reduction inthe clinical attachment level parameter was observed in the LCT group, while a greater increase ingingival thickness was observed in the DLSBF group. The presence of scars was the only parameterfor which statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two study groups were found.(4) Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it indicates that the LCT + SCTG techniquemay be considered an optimal technique in terms of reducing gingival recession depth, completeroot coverage and esthetic results for the treatment of single gingival recessions in the mandibularanterior! teeth.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectroot coveragees_ES
dc.subjectestheticses_ES
dc.subjectmandibular anterior teethes_ES
dc.subjectdouble lateral sliding bridge flapes_ES
dc.subject.meshConnective Tissue *
dc.subject.meshGingival Recession *
dc.subject.meshGingival Retraction Techniques *
dc.titleDouble lateral sliding bridge flap versus laterally closed tunnel for the treatment of single recessions in the mandibular anterior teeth: A pseudorandomized clinical triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/ 10.3390/JCM11102918es_ES
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatologíaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/JCM11102918
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2077-0383
dc.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicinees_ES
dc.volume.number11es_ES
dc.issue.number10es_ES
dc.page.initial2918es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decstejido conectivo *
dc.subject.decsrecesión gingival *
dc.subject.decstécnicas de retracción gingival *


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional