Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorDib Zakkour, Sara
dc.contributor.authorDib Zakkour, Juan 
dc.contributor.authorGuadilla González, Yasmina 
dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorDib Zaitun, Ibrahim 
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-21T09:10:41Z
dc.date.available2025-11-21T09:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-30
dc.identifier.citationDib Zakkour, S., Dib Zakkour, J., Guadilla, Y., Montero, J., & Dib, A. (2023). [Rev. of Comparative Evaluation of the Digital Workflow and Conventional Method in Manufacturing Complete Removal Prostheses]. Materials, 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA16216955es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/167960
dc.description.abstract[EN]The aging population in developed countries has increased the number of edentulous patients and, therefore, the need for prosthetic rehabilitation to improve their quality of life. Complete dentures are the main treatment option in these cases. The use of CAD/CAM (Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing) in dentistry has improved clinical protocols and outcomes, achieving a reduction in work time and economic costs for the patients. The main objective of this review was to compare the characteristics of conventional and digital dentures, attempting to determine whether the use of new technologies represents an improvement in the properties of removable complete dentures. A bibliographic review was carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scielo, and Embase databases. With the initial search, 157 articles were obtained. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 64 publications were selected for this bibliographic review. The different conclusions of the studies consulted were compared regarding fit and retention, fracture resistance, surface roughness, biocompatibility, and aesthetics, taking into account the different methods of prostheses fabrication. In general, digital prostheses have shown better mechanical properties and, consequently, better biocompatibility and aesthetics than conventional prostheses. However, the obtained results were very heterogeneous, preventing a supported conclusion.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectDigitales_ES
dc.subjectRemovable complete dental prosthesises_ES
dc.subjectCAD/CAMes_ES
dc.subjectComplete denturees_ES
dc.subject.meshDenture, Complete *
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis *
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of the Digital Workflow and Conventional Method in Manufacturing Complete Removal Prostheseses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/21/6955es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/MA16216955
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleMaterialeses_ES
dc.volume.number16es_ES
dc.issue.number21es_ES
dc.page.initial6955es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decsdentadura postiza completa *
dc.subject.decsprótesis dental *


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que CC0 1.0 Universal