Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorBecerro Álvarez, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorPardal Peláez, Beatriz 
dc.contributor.authorQuispe López, Norberto 
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Blanco, Juan Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorGómez Polo, Cristina 
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-22T12:53:41Z
dc.date.available2025-11-22T12:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMontero, J., Becerro, A., Pardal-Peláez, B., Quispe-López, N., Blanco, J.-F., & Gómez-Polo, C. (2021). [Rev. of Main 3D manufacturing techniques for customized bone substitutes. A systematic review]. Materials, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA14102524es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/167972
dc.description.abstract[EN]Clinicians should be aware of the main methods and materials to face the challenge of bone shortage by manufacturing customized grafts, in order to repair defects. This study aims to carry out a bibliographic review of the existing methods to manufacture customized bone scaffolds through 3D technology and to identify their current situation based on the published papers. A literature search was carried out using “3D scaffold”, “bone regeneration”, “robocasting” and “3D printing” as descriptors. This search strategy was performed on PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and Cochrane Library, but also by hand search in relevant journals and throughout the selected papers. All the papers focusing on techniques for manufacturing customized bone scaffolds were reviewed. The 62 articles identified described 14 techniques (4 subtraction + 10 addition techniques). Scaffold fabrication techniques can be also be classified according to the time at which they are developed, into Conventional techniques and Solid Freeform Fabrication techniques. The conventional techniques are unable to control the architecture of the pore and the pore interconnection. However, current Solid Freeform Fabrication techniques allow individualizing and generating complex geometries of porosity. To conclude, currently SLA (Stereolithography), Robocasting and FDM (Fused deposition modeling) are promising options in customized bone regeneration.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject3 D scaffoldes_ES
dc.subjectBone regenerationes_ES
dc.subjectTissue engineeringes_ES
dc.subject.meshTissue Engineering *
dc.subject.meshBone Regeneration *
dc.titleMain 3D Manufacturing Techniques for Customized Bone Substitutes. A Systematic Reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102524es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma14102524
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1996-1944
dc.journal.titleMaterialses_ES
dc.volume.number14es_ES
dc.issue.number10es_ES
dc.page.initial2524es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decsregeneración ósea *
dc.subject.decsingeniería tisular *


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional