Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorPardal Peláez, Beatriz 
dc.contributor.authorDib Zaitun, Ibrahim 
dc.contributor.authorGuadilla González, Yasmina 
dc.contributor.authorFlores Fraile, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorQuispe López, Norberto 
dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-09T08:16:03Z
dc.date.available2025-12-09T08:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPardal-Peláez, B., Dib, A., Guadilla, Y., Flores-Fraile, J., Quispe-López, N., & Montero, J. (2023). Marginal Bone Loss and Treatment Complications with Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants—A Randomized Clinical Trial. Prosthesis, 5(1), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.3390/PROSTHESIS5010022es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/168150
dc.description.abstract[EN]This study aimed to assess marginal bone loss and complication rates of mandibular overdentures retained on two implants with conventional and immediate loading protocols. Twenty edentulous patients were treated with mandibular two-implant-retained overdentures and new complete maxillary dentures. In one half of the sample, the implants were loaded immediately by VulkanLoc® abutments. In the counterpart group, these abutments were connected to the implants two months after implant placement (conventional protocol). Treatment outcomes were evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months after implant placement. According to the pre- and post-insertion radiographs, there was a mean marginal bone loss of 0.25–0.59 mm (CI 95%) after 13.4 2.1 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups. The failure rate (percentage of implants failing per year) was slightly higher in the conventional loading group (14.0 32.7%) than in the immediate loading group (8.3 18.0%). The findings of the present study suggested that there were no differences in marginal bone loss observed at one year for immediately loaded implants (0.40–0.39 mm) versus conventionally loaded implants (0.44- 0.36 mm) placed for the retention of mandibular overdentures. There were no differences in primary and secondary stability of immediately loaded versus conventional implants; however, in the conventional loading group, stability increased significantly between implant placement compared at both 6 and 12 months post-placement.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAlveolar bone losses_ES
dc.subjectDental implantses_ES
dc.subjectDenturees_ES
dc.subjectImmediate dental implant loadinges_ES
dc.subject.meshDental Implants *
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss *
dc.titleMarginal Bone Loss and Treatment Complications with Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants—A Randomized Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010022es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/prosthesis5010022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2673-1592
dc.journal.titleProsthesises_ES
dc.volume.number5es_ES
dc.issue.number1es_ES
dc.page.initial295es_ES
dc.page.final309es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decspérdida de hueso alveolar *
dc.subject.decsimplantes dentales *


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional