Using fit perspectives to explain supply chain risk management efficacy

Abstract

[EN] Supply chain risk management (SCRM) literature acknowledges that the choice of SCRM strategies should fit with contextual factors. Yet empirical support for this premise is scarce, mainly relies on just a single type of fit analysis, and lacks any consideration of organizational structures. Accordingly, this article combines two perspectives of fit analysis: ‘fit as profile deviation’ and ‘fit as moderation’. The former supports the introduction of two concepts: risk management incoherence (RMI) and risk management efficacy (RME). Whereas RMI refers to the lack of fit between the perceived usefulness of different mitigation strategies and their degree of implementation; RME pertains to the fit between the perceived relevance of different SCRM objectives and the degree to which they are achieved. The latter allows us to posit a negative effect of RMI on RME and a negative moderation of the time assigned to a Risk Manager on that effect. A sample of 106 companies confirms the proposed model. Therefore, this study expands existing literature on contingent SCRM and on organizational structures for SCRM.