
Compartir
Título
Analyzing Narrative Empathy in Readers' Responses to Literature: A Taxonomy of Linguistic Evidence of Empathetic Responses
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
empathy with characters
empirical study of literature
linguistic evidence of empathy
reader response research
narrative empathy
empatía con personajes
estudio empírico de la literatura
evidencia lingüística de la empatía
investigación sobre respuesta de lectores
empatía narrativa
Clasificación UNESCO
6202.02 Análisis Literario
Fecha de publicación
2025
Editor
The Ohio State University Press
Citación
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2025). Analyzing narrative empathy in readers’ responses to literature: a taxonomy of linguistic evidence of empathetic responses. Narrative, 33(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.00012
Resumen
[EN] The study of narrative empathy (i.e., readers’ sharing of characters’ perspectives and mental states) is getting increasing attention from theoretical and empirical perspectives. Recently, a number of empirical quantitative and qualitative studies have been conducted on empathy in literary reading. However, in qualitative studies where participants are not directly prompted to comment on empathy, the analysis of empathetic responses raises an important methodological problem; namely, determining whether and how there is evidence of empathy in readers’ verbal responses. This article proposes a way to operationalize, or make workable, what counts as evidence of narrative empathy by developing a taxonomy of linguistic evidence of empathetic responses that ranges from explicit to implicit evidence. The taxonomy is illustrated with data from a focus group study of readers’ responses to two short stories by Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano.
This research makes a methodological contribution by outlining a framework for the qualitative analysis of empathetic responses. At the same time, the article considers some caveats in the analysis of readers’ responses which may be valuable for those conducting empirical reader research in general because these issues ultimately influence the analysis and interpretation of the data, and thus, the results obtained. I argue for a shift in current scholarly discussion toward the issues that concern the actual analysis of reader responses without shying away from acknowledging the problems that arise in the process of analysis. This discussion should be of interest to scholars working in empirical narratology, empirical stylistics, and empirical literary studies.
URI
ISSN
1063-3685
DOI
10.1353/nar.00012
Versión del editor
Collections












