Compartir
Título
Quality of life of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma initiating first-line chemotherapy in routine practice
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Cancer chemotherapy
EORTC QLQ-C30
Health-related quality of life
Pancreatic Cancer
Performance status
Fecha de publicación
2020
Editor
BioMed Central
Citación
Laquente, B., Macarulla, T., Bugés, C., Martín, M., García, C., Pericay, C., Merino, S., Visa, L., Martín, T., Pedraza, M., Carnero, B., Guardeño, R., Verdaguer, H., Mut, A., Vilanova, D., & García, A. (2020). Quality of life of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma initiating first-line chemotherapy in routine practice. BMC Palliative Care, 19(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00610-4
Resumen
[ES]El artículo analiza la evolución de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con adenocarcinoma pancreático metastásico que inician quimioterapia de primera línea en práctica clínica habitual. Se trata de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico realizado en 12 centros españoles con 116 pacientes. Como resultado principal, se observa que, en términos generales, la calidad de vida mejora durante el tratamiento, especialmente en dimensiones como el dolor, la pérdida de apetito, las alteraciones del sueño, las náuseas y el estreñimiento. Además, el trabajo señala que una mejor puntuación basal en calidad de vida se asocia con una mayor supervivencia global y una mayor supervivencia libre de progresión. [EN]Background: Despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, pancreatic adenocarcinoma often progresses rapidly and causes death. The physical decline of these patients is expected to impact their quality of life (QoL). Therefore, in addition to objective measures of effectiveness, the evaluation of health-related QoL should be considered a matter of major concern when assessing therapy outcomes. Methods: Observational, prospective, multicenter study including patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who started first-line chemotherapy in 12 Spanish centers. Treatment and clinical characteristics were recorded at baseline. Patients’ health-related quality of life, ECOG, and Karnofsky index were measured at baseline, at Days 15 and 30, and every four weeks up to 6months of chemotherapy. Health-related quality of life was measured using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires. Other endpoints included overall survival and progression-free survival. Results: The study sample included 116 patients (median age of 65years). Mean (SD) scores for the QLQ-C30 global health status scale showed a significant increasing trend throughout the treatment (p = 0.005). Patients with either a Karnofsky index of 70–80 or ECOG 2 showed greater improvement in the QLQ-C30 global health status score than the corresponding groups with better performance status (p ≤ 0.010). Pain, appetite, sleep disturbance, nausea, and constipation significantly improved throughout the treatment (p < 0.005). Patients with QLQ-C30 global health status scores ≥50 at baseline had significantly greater overall survival and progression-free survival (p =0.005andp =0.021, respectively). No significant associations were observed regarding the EQ-5D score. Conclusions: Most metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line chemotherapy showed an increase in health-related quality of life scores throughout the treatment. Patients with lower performance status and health-related quality of life at baseline tended to greater improvement. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scale allowed us to measure the health-related quality of life of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.
Descripción
[ES]Es un trabajo clínico centrado en oncología paliativa que evalúa no solo la eficacia terapéutica, sino también el impacto del tratamiento sobre el bienestar percibido por el paciente. Su interés principal reside en aportar evidencia de práctica real sobre una enfermedad de muy mal pronóstico, subrayando que la medición sistemática de la calidad de vida puede ser útil tanto para valorar el beneficio clínico como para orientar decisiones terapéuticas.
URI
DOI
10.1186/s12904-020-00610-4
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones













