Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorSantamaría, Diego
dc.contributor.authorAlmena, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martín, Mariano 
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-10T07:33:22Z
dc.date.available2026-07-10T07:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2026-06
dc.identifier.citationSantamaría, D., Almena, A., Sánchez, A., & Martín, M. (2026). Retrofitting existing combined cycle power plants to enable carbon circularity through Power-to-Methane energy storage. Energy Conversion and Management, 357, 121429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121429es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/172110
dc.description.abstract[EN]Energy storage is a critical component in the transition to a renewable based energy system. To face this challenge, Power-to-X technologies are gaining increased attention. This study investigates the conversion of surplus electricity from wind and solar sources into hydrogen, and subsequently into methane, utilizing existing natural gas infrastructure for efficient storage, transport and conversion into electricity. The process consists of two main stages: first, the production of methane using Power-to-X technologies during periods of excess renewable energy production. Second, the generation of electricity during peak demand, with CO2 captured for reuse in methane synthesis creating a closed carbon loop. This integrated system repurposes combined cycle power plants, developing a Power-to-Methane-to-Power (PtMtP) configuration. Two alternative combustion approaches are evaluated: oxy-combustion (OC), which simplifies CO2 purification and air combustion or ordinary combustion or conventional combustion (CC), which requires more complex purification methods such as amine absorption or pressure swing adsorption (PSA). Results indicate that CC with CO2 capture via amine absorption is the most profitable process, especially when it is assumed that the oxygen produced by the electrolyzer is sold. For a 400 MW CCPP, the electricity production cost ranges from 650 to 750 $/MWh when the income from oxygen sales is neglected. However, if it is assumed that the market can absorb the full output of electrolytic oxygen, the production cost decreases to between 450 and 550 $/MWh.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectCarbon capturees_ES
dc.subjectHydrogenes_ES
dc.subjectMethanees_ES
dc.subjectCombined Cycle Power Plantes_ES
dc.subjectPower-to-Methanees_ES
dc.titleRetrofitting existing combined cycle power plants to enable carbon circularity through Power-to-Methane energy storagees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121429es_ES
dc.subject.unesco3310.05 Ingeniería de Procesoses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121429
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleEnergy Conversion and Managementes_ES
dc.volume.number357es_ES
dc.page.initial121429es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution 4.0 International