Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorDu, Yanglin
dc.contributor.authorVillarrubia González, Gabriel 
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-23T08:52:22Z
dc.date.available2026-07-23T08:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-09
dc.identifier.citationY. Du and G. Villarrubia-González, "Lightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translation," in IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 56266-56288, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/172272
dc.description.abstract[EN]Automated skin lesion segmentation via deep learning has achieved remarkable accuracy in controlled laboratory settings, yet its clinical translation to point-of-care (PoC) edge devices remains fundamentally constrained by the computational demands of state-of-the-art architectures. This review systematically bridges the gap between algorithmic innovation and hardware-aware deployment by presenting a critical analysis spanning three interconnected dimensions: 1) architectural evolution from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) through Vision Transformers to emerging linear-complexity State Space Models (e.g., Mamba), evaluated against a unified efficiency–accuracy Pareto framework rather than isolated accuracy rankings; 2) mathematical formalisation of lightweighting-induced precision degradation and its compensation via knowledge distillation, structural reparameterisation, and frequency-domain enhancement, with explicit assessment of evidence quality and reproducibility across studies; and 3) empirical deployment profiling across heterogeneous edge platforms including NVIDIA Jetson, Intel OpenVINO, and mobile processors. Through a multi-dimensional evaluation framework integrating spatial overlap (Dice), boundary fidelity (HD95), and on-device throughput (FPS), supplemented by a meta-analysis of dataset usage biases and validation protocol inconsistencies, we establish that heterogeneous multi-paradigm fusion architectures can preserve clinical-grade segmentation quality under severe resource constraints—provided that evaluation methodologies are standardised. Critically, our quantitative analysis of 36 reviewed studies reveals that approximately 65% of reported performance figures are derived from non-standardised data splits, rendering direct cross-study comparisons statistically unreliable. We further identify critical open challenges—including cross-domain generalisation, hardware–algorithm co-design, demographic fairness, and edge-native federated learning—an...es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIEEEes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectEdge computinges_ES
dc.subjectEvaluation standardizationes_ES
dc.subjectKnowledge distillationes_ES
dc.subjectLightweight neural networkses_ES
dc.subjectMedical image segmentationes_ES
dc.subjectPoint-of-care diagnosticses_ES
dc.subjectSkin lesion segmentationes_ES
dc.subjectState space modelses_ES
dc.titleLightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11478267es_ES
dc.subject.unesco1203 Ciencia de los ordenadoreses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleIEEE Accesses_ES
dc.volume.number14es_ES
dc.page.initial56266es_ES
dc.page.final56288es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples

Attribution 4.0 International
Exceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution 4.0 International