
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Du, Yanglin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Villarrubia González, Gabriel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-23T08:52:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-23T08:52:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Y. Du and G. Villarrubia-González, "Lightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translation," in IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 56266-56288, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2169-3536 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/172272 | |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN]Automated skin lesion segmentation via deep learning has achieved remarkable accuracy in controlled laboratory settings, yet its clinical translation to point-of-care (PoC) edge devices remains fundamentally constrained by the computational demands of state-of-the-art architectures. This review systematically bridges the gap between algorithmic innovation and hardware-aware deployment by presenting a critical analysis spanning three interconnected dimensions: 1) architectural evolution from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) through Vision Transformers to emerging linear-complexity State Space Models (e.g., Mamba), evaluated against a unified efficiency–accuracy Pareto framework rather than isolated accuracy rankings; 2) mathematical formalisation of lightweighting-induced precision degradation and its compensation via knowledge distillation, structural reparameterisation, and frequency-domain enhancement, with explicit assessment of evidence quality and reproducibility across studies; and 3) empirical deployment profiling across heterogeneous edge platforms including NVIDIA Jetson, Intel OpenVINO, and mobile processors. Through a multi-dimensional evaluation framework integrating spatial overlap (Dice), boundary fidelity (HD95), and on-device throughput (FPS), supplemented by a meta-analysis of dataset usage biases and validation protocol inconsistencies, we establish that heterogeneous multi-paradigm fusion architectures can preserve clinical-grade segmentation quality under severe resource constraints—provided that evaluation methodologies are standardised. Critically, our quantitative analysis of 36 reviewed studies reveals that approximately 65% of reported performance figures are derived from non-standardised data splits, rendering direct cross-study comparisons statistically unreliable. We further identify critical open challenges—including cross-domain generalisation, hardware–algorithm co-design, demographic fairness, and edge-native federated learning—an... | es_ES |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | IEEE | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | es_ES |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Edge computing | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Evaluation standardization | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Knowledge distillation | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Lightweight neural networks | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Medical image segmentation | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Point-of-care diagnostics | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Skin lesion segmentation | es_ES |
| dc.subject | State space models | es_ES |
| dc.title | Lightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translation | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publishversion | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11478267 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.unesco | 1203 Ciencia de los ordenadores | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.journal.title | IEEE Access | es_ES |
| dc.volume.number | 14 | es_ES |
| dc.page.initial | 56266 | es_ES |
| dc.page.final | 56288 | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es_ES |








