Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDu, Yanglin
dc.contributor.authorVillarrubia González, Gabriel 
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-23T08:52:22Z
dc.date.available2026-07-23T08:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-09
dc.identifier.citationY. Du and G. Villarrubia-González, "Lightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translation," in IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 56266-56288, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/172272
dc.description.abstract[EN]Automated skin lesion segmentation via deep learning has achieved remarkable accuracy in controlled laboratory settings, yet its clinical translation to point-of-care (PoC) edge devices remains fundamentally constrained by the computational demands of state-of-the-art architectures. This review systematically bridges the gap between algorithmic innovation and hardware-aware deployment by presenting a critical analysis spanning three interconnected dimensions: 1) architectural evolution from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) through Vision Transformers to emerging linear-complexity State Space Models (e.g., Mamba), evaluated against a unified efficiency–accuracy Pareto framework rather than isolated accuracy rankings; 2) mathematical formalisation of lightweighting-induced precision degradation and its compensation via knowledge distillation, structural reparameterisation, and frequency-domain enhancement, with explicit assessment of evidence quality and reproducibility across studies; and 3) empirical deployment profiling across heterogeneous edge platforms including NVIDIA Jetson, Intel OpenVINO, and mobile processors. Through a multi-dimensional evaluation framework integrating spatial overlap (Dice), boundary fidelity (HD95), and on-device throughput (FPS), supplemented by a meta-analysis of dataset usage biases and validation protocol inconsistencies, we establish that heterogeneous multi-paradigm fusion architectures can preserve clinical-grade segmentation quality under severe resource constraints—provided that evaluation methodologies are standardised. Critically, our quantitative analysis of 36 reviewed studies reveals that approximately 65% of reported performance figures are derived from non-standardised data splits, rendering direct cross-study comparisons statistically unreliable. We further identify critical open challenges—including cross-domain generalisation, hardware–algorithm co-design, demographic fairness, and edge-native federated learning—an...es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIEEEes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectEdge computinges_ES
dc.subjectEvaluation standardizationes_ES
dc.subjectKnowledge distillationes_ES
dc.subjectLightweight neural networkses_ES
dc.subjectMedical image segmentationes_ES
dc.subjectPoint-of-care diagnosticses_ES
dc.subjectSkin lesion segmentationes_ES
dc.subjectState space modelses_ES
dc.titleLightweight Skin Lesion Segmentation for Edge Deployment: A Critical Review of Architectures, Accuracy Compensation, and Clinical Translationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11478267es_ES
dc.subject.unesco1203 Ciencia de los ordenadoreses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3682487
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleIEEE Accesses_ES
dc.volume.number14es_ES
dc.page.initial56266es_ES
dc.page.final56288es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International