<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-16T09:13:32Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/127275" metadataPrefix="edm">https://gredos.usal.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/127275</identifier><datestamp>2025-06-05T12:36:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10366_68584</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_4512</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_3823</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_68585</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/EDM.xsd">
<edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127275">
<dc:creator>Alcantud, José Carlos R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Laruelle, Annick</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2014-06</dc:date>
<dc:description>[EN]The  voting  rule  considered  in  this  paper  belongs  to  a  large  class  of  voting&#xd;
systems, called "range voting" or "utilitarian voting", where each voter rates each&#xd;
candidate with the help of a given evaluation scale and the winner is the candidate&#xd;
with the highest total score.  In approval voting the evaluation scale only consists&#xd;
of  two  levels:  1  (approval)  and  0  (non  approval).   However  non  approval  may&#xd;
mean  disapproval  or  just  indifierence  or  even  absence  of  suficient  knowledge&#xd;
for  evaluating  the  candidate.   In  this  paper  we  propose  a  characterization  of&#xd;
a  rule  (that  we  refer  to  as  dis&amp;approval  voting)  that  allows  for  a  third  level&#xd;
in  the  evaluation  scale.   The  three  levels  have  the  following  interpretation:  1&#xd;
means approval, 0 means indifierence, abstention or `do not know', and -1 means&#xd;
disapproval.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127275</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:subject>5307.15 Teoría microeconómica</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Dis&amp;approval voting: a characterization</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<edm:type>TEXT</edm:type>
</edm:ProvidedCHO>
<ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127275#aggregation">
<edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127275"/>
<edm:dataProvider>Gredos. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Salamanca</edm:dataProvider>
<edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127275"/>
<edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/10366/127275/1/Disapproval.pdf"/>
<edm:provider>Hispana</edm:provider>
<edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
</ore:Aggregation>
<edm:WebResource rdf:about="https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/10366/127275/1/Disapproval.pdf">
<edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
</edm:WebResource>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>