<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-14T12:44:21Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/148324" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://gredos.usal.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/148324</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-30T20:42:57Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10366_4549</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_4512</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_3823</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_4550</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group</title>
<creator>González Pérez, Laura Icela</creator>
<creator>Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad</creator>
<creator>García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.</creator>
<subject>user experience</subject>
<subject>institutional repositories</subject>
<subject>focus group</subject>
<subject>digital identity</subject>
<subject>higher education</subject>
<subject>educational innovation</subject>
<subject>higher education</subject>
<subject>open science</subject>
<subject>education 4.0</subject>
<description>User experience with intuitive and flexible digital platforms can be enjoyable and satisfying.&#xd;
A strategy to deliver such an experience is to place the users at the center of the design process and&#xd;
analyze their beliefs and perceptions to add appropriate platform features. This study conducted&#xd;
with focus groups as a qualitative method of data collection to investigate users’ preferences and&#xd;
develop a new landing page for institutional repositories with attractive functionalities based on their&#xd;
information-structural rules. The research question was: What are the motivations and experiences&#xd;
of users in an academic community when publishing scientific information in an institutional&#xd;
repository? The focus group technique used in this study had three sessions. Results showed that&#xd;
50% of the participants did not know the functionalities of the institutional repository nor its benefits.&#xd;
Users’ perceptions of platforms such as ResearchGate or Google Scholar that provide academic&#xd;
production were also identified. The findings showed that motivating an academic community to use&#xd;
an institutional repository requires technological functions, user guidelines that identify what can&#xd;
or cannot be published in open access, and training programs for open access publication practices&#xd;
and institutional repository use. These measures align with global strategies to strengthen the digital&#xd;
identities of scientific communities and thus benefit open science.</description>
<date>2022-01-17</date>
<date>2022-01-17</date>
<date>2021</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>González-Pérez, L. I., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., &amp; García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group. Future Internet, 13(11), Article 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13110282</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10366/148324</identifier>
<identifier>10.3390/fi13110282</identifier>
<identifier>1999-5903</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>http://doi.org/10.3390/fi13110282</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</rights>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional</rights>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>