<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T01:26:08Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/166534" metadataPrefix="marc">https://gredos.usal.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/166534</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-19T00:01:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10366_122445</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_4746</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_3823</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_121440</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_143090</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_123103</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_122448</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_122454</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_143135</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Granados Aguilar, María del Castellar</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2025</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">[EN] In light of current debates on democratic backsliding and institutional legitimacy, this&#xd;
research is relevant for two key reasons. First, if, as Munck and Luna (2022) posit,&#xd;
institutions are intended to serve as “avenues of inclusion”, then understanding why they&#xd;
fail to inspire trust, particularly among marginalized populations, is essential. In this sense,&#xd;
the relevance of this research lies in its potential to offer insights into the responsiveness&#xd;
and inclusiveness of democratic representation in socially diverse and fragmented&#xd;
landscapes. The principle of equal opportunity is a foundational element of contemporary&#xd;
democratic systems (Milanovic, 2020). Research shows that institutions designed to&#xd;
promote political equality tend to enhance levels of trust among citizens (Nannestad et al.,&#xd;
2014; Rothstein &amp; Uslaner, 2005), just as societies characterized by high political trust are&#xd;
more likely to support inclusive institutional frameworks (Berg &amp; Bjørnskov, 2011;&#xd;
Bjørnskov &amp; Svendsen, 2013). Second, this dissertation challenges the dominant assumption that declining political trust&#xd;
necessarily harms democracy. Understanding how low levels of trust, echoing Hirschman’s&#xd;
(1970) loyalty notion, may impact citizen engagement (through exit or voice behaviors) is&#xd;
important for assessing whether declines in political trust weakens democracy, as suggested&#xd;
by the traditional literature (Dalton, 2004; Klingemann and Fuchs, 1995; Linz and Stepan,&#xd;
1996; Mishler and Rose, 1997), or whether, on the contrary, they might actually foster an&#xd;
active democratic citizenship. In this sense, by regarding political trust as not only the&#xd;
outcome but also the predictor, this study sheds light on its potential consequences, an area&#xd;
that remains underexplored, as several scholars have exposed (Carstens, 2023; Devine,&#xd;
2024; Citrin &amp; Stoker, 2018; Levi &amp; Stoker, 2000).</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10366/166534</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Tesis y disertaciones académicas</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Universidad de Salamanca (España)</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Tesis Doctoral</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Academic dissertations</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Political trust</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">inequality</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">race and ethnicity</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Latin America</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">social mobility</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Eppur si muove. Causes and Consequences of Political Trust in Contexts of Inequality: The Case of Latin America</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>