<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-14T15:12:06Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/166534" metadataPrefix="mods">https://gredos.usal.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/166534</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-19T00:01:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10366_122445</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_4746</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_3823</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_121440</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_143090</setSpec><setSpec>com_10366_123103</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_122448</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_122454</setSpec><setSpec>col_10366_143135</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Granados Aguilar, María del Castellar</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2025-07-18T08:45:58Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2025-07-18T08:45:58Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2025</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10366/166534</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>[EN] In light of current debates on democratic backsliding and institutional legitimacy, this&#xd;
research is relevant for two key reasons. First, if, as Munck and Luna (2022) posit,&#xd;
institutions are intended to serve as “avenues of inclusion”, then understanding why they&#xd;
fail to inspire trust, particularly among marginalized populations, is essential. In this sense,&#xd;
the relevance of this research lies in its potential to offer insights into the responsiveness&#xd;
and inclusiveness of democratic representation in socially diverse and fragmented&#xd;
landscapes. The principle of equal opportunity is a foundational element of contemporary&#xd;
democratic systems (Milanovic, 2020). Research shows that institutions designed to&#xd;
promote political equality tend to enhance levels of trust among citizens (Nannestad et al.,&#xd;
2014; Rothstein &amp; Uslaner, 2005), just as societies characterized by high political trust are&#xd;
more likely to support inclusive institutional frameworks (Berg &amp; Bjørnskov, 2011;&#xd;
Bjørnskov &amp; Svendsen, 2013). Second, this dissertation challenges the dominant assumption that declining political trust&#xd;
necessarily harms democracy. Understanding how low levels of trust, echoing Hirschman’s&#xd;
(1970) loyalty notion, may impact citizen engagement (through exit or voice behaviors) is&#xd;
important for assessing whether declines in political trust weakens democracy, as suggested&#xd;
by the traditional literature (Dalton, 2004; Klingemann and Fuchs, 1995; Linz and Stepan,&#xd;
1996; Mishler and Rose, 1997), or whether, on the contrary, they might actually foster an&#xd;
active democratic citizenship. In this sense, by regarding political trust as not only the&#xd;
outcome but also the predictor, this study sheds light on its potential consequences, an area&#xd;
that remains underexplored, as several scholars have exposed (Carstens, 2023; Devine,&#xd;
2024; Citrin &amp; Stoker, 2018; Levi &amp; Stoker, 2000).</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Tesis y disertaciones académicas</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Universidad de Salamanca (España)</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Tesis Doctoral</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Academic dissertations</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Political trust</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>inequality</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>race and ethnicity</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Latin America</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>social mobility</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>Eppur si muove. Causes and Consequences of Political Trust in Contexts of Inequality: The Case of Latin America</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>