2026-09-15T04:53:07Zhttps://gredos.usal.es/oai/requestoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1675592025-10-31T01:00:43Zcom_10366_4623com_10366_4576com_10366_3823col_10366_4624
Eye-Tracking Studies in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Setien‑Ramos, I.
Lugo‑Marín, J.
Gisbert‑Gustemps, L.
Díez Villoria, Emiliano
Magán Maganto, María Carmen
Canal Bedia, Ricardo
Ramos‑Quiroga, J.A.
Autism spectrum disorder
Adults
Eye-tracking
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
[EN]Eye-tracking studies have shown potential in effectively discriminating between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and non- ASD groups. The main objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies in adults with ASD. A total of 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Eyes and Non-Social regions proved better for discriminating between ASD and non-ASD adults, while fixation duration seems to be the outcome to choose. Active engaged tasks seem to reduce differences between ASD and non-ASD adults, regardless of the emotional content of the stimuli/task. Proportional fixation duration on eyes and non-social areas in non-active tasks (e.g. free viewing) seems to be the best eye-tracking design for increasing the sensitivity and specificity in ASD adults.
2025-10-30
2025-10-30
2022-03-30
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Setien-Ramos, I., Lugo-Marín, J., Gisbert-Gustemps, L. et al. Eye-Tracking Studies in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 2430–2443 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05524-z
0162-3257
http://hdl.handle.net/10366/167559
10.1007/s10803-022-05524-z
eng
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-022-05524-z#citeas
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/PID2019-107177RB-I00
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/TED2021-129301B-I00);
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Springer