http://hdl.handle.net/10366/4200 2026-05-09T11:02:28Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171307 [EN]This article interrogates the governance of religious and ethnic diversity in contemporary Spain, advancing a critical analysis of selective secularism as a meta-governance logic that structures symbolic hierarchies and practical exclusions. Selective secularism operates through the culturalisation of Catholicism as “neutral” national heritage and the religionisation of minority, especially Muslim, cultural expressions, reinforcing asymmetrical regimes of recognition beneath a veneer of formal pluralism. Through analysis of legal cases, judicial reasoning and the mobilisation of lay Catholic neoconservative networks, the article shows how intersecting top-down and bottom-up mechanisms entrench Catholic dominance while problematising racialised Muslim-coded presence. Building on the Bristol School of Multiculturalism and Sealy’s model of post-multicultural multilogue, Spain is situated as a paradigmatic “post-secular laboratory” in which rapid social transformation exposes both the limits and the inertia of liberal–secular governance. While dialogical engagement and “levelling up” strategies have significantly shaped academic and policy debates, they do not resolve the persistent marginalisation of transcultural actors, particularly descendants of Muslim migrants and native converts to Islam, whose hybrid biographies unsettle dominant binaries yet remain institutionally under-recognised. The article therefore advances a post-secular, transcultural principle of recognition and operationalises transcultural capital not merely as an adaptive resource at the micro or meso level, but as a mechanism for macro-level transformation in diversity governance. Anchored in the ongoing contestation over Islamic burial rights and the evolving practices of the Pluralism and Coexistence Foundation, the analysis demonstrates that only by empowering transcultural actors as co-authors, rather than passive consultees, can Spain recalibrate its model of religious diversity governance. The framework developed offers a way beyond segmented recognition of diversity and cosmetic pluralism, with implications for majority–minority relations across Europe. 2026-05-06T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171257 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171256 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171254 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171253 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171251 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171250 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171249 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171246 [ES]Los capítulos (86 pp en total) se dedican a comentar el nuevo régimen de la capacidad posesoria (art. 443 CC) y el de Sucesiones (resto) tras las modificaciones introducidas por la Ley 8/2021 que incorpora al Derecho Común la Convención de Nueva York de 2006, poniendo de relieve la importancia del nuevo paradigma que supone el reconocimiento de capacidad plena en estas sedes a las personas con discapacidad. Fue uno de los primeros comentarios al nuevo régimen, con el objetivo de esclarecer su aplicación y respetar los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Cabe destacar el estudio de la oportunidad de la supresión de la sustitución ejemplar en el testamento (y su régimen transitorio) o el nuevo mayor alcance permitido al gravamen de las legítimas, así como el papel de los discapacitados en la tramitación de la herencia (aceptación, y partición). [EN]The chapters (86 pages in total) are dedicated to commenting on the new legal framework governing possessory capacity (Art. 443 of the Civil Code) and the inheritance law (remaining articles) following the amendments introduced by Law 8/2021, which incorporates the 2006 New York Convention into Spanish law. They highlight the importance of the new paradigm represented by the recognition of full legal capacity for people with disabilities in these matters. This was one of the first commentaries on the new legal framework, aiming to clarify its application and ensure respect for the rights of people with disabilities. Of particular note is the analysis of the appropriateness of eliminating the provision for exemplary substitution in wills (and its transitional provisions), the broader scope now permitted for encumbrances on forced heirship shares, and the role of people with disabilities in inheritance proceedings (acceptance and division). 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171218 [ES]A lo largo de la historia, la violencia ha sido un tema de interés sostenido, dando lugar a numerosas reflexiones, conceptualizaciones y clasificaciones que se hace necesario revisar constantemente. Este trabajo se aparta de esas prácticas comunes para ofrecer un análisis crítico a partir de diversas perspectivas teóricas. Su objetivo es explorar, desde un enfoque hermenéutico, las raíces histórico-culturales del fenómeno, poniendo especial énfasis en la violencia contra las mujeres e integrando una visión situada desde Latinoamérica. Se observa que la violencia de género ha evolucionado de ser un mero problema social a convertirse en una cuestión política relevante. No obstante, se concluye la necesidad de desarrollar nuevos enfoques que aborden el fenómeno de manera compleja e integral, desde una perspectiva interseccional y decolonial.[EN]Throughout history, violence has been a topic of sustained interest, giving rise to numerous reflections, conceptualizations and classifications that need to be constantly reviewed. This paper departs from these common practices to offer a critical analysisbased on different theoretical perspectives. Its objective is to explore, from a hermeneutic approach, the historical-cultural roots of the phenomenon, placing special emphasis on violence against women and integrating a Latin American perspective. It isobserved that gender violence has evolved from being a mere social problem to become a relevant political issue. However, it is concluded that there is a need to develop new approaches that address the phenomenon in a complex and comprehensive way, from an intersectional and decolonial perspective. 2026-04-30T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171217 The right to collective bargaining and the binding character of collective agreements is enshrined in the Spanish Constitution (Artículo 37.1). Moreover, the system of collective bargaining is thoroughly regulated in Title III of the Workers’ Statute. In particular, Section 82.3 establishes the legally binding character of collective agreements negotiated in conformity with the rules of the Workers’ Statute. However, the same provision stipulates (as an exception to the general rule) that company agreements may deviate from the wages set by a statutory collective agreement negotiated at a higher level, provided certain requirements are fulfilled. This paper examines the sector-level bargaining and the possibilities for deviations at company level in Spain. 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171216 This comparative report of the GDPiR-project addresses digitalisation and datafication in the employment context both as a challenge and an opportunity for social partners to collectively shape the future of work and aiming to provide them with the proper skills and knowledge to effectively act in this context. Notably, effective social dialogue and collective bargaining over data processing in the workplace can only be achieved if workers’ representatives and trade unionists in different countries are adequately trained and get a deep knowledge of the national and European legislation in this field as well as of the best practices performed by social partners at the national and transnational level. Since the use of data and big data is spreading pervasively in any business activity and is gaining importance in decision-making processes impacting on workers, data processing is due to become a fundamental subject of collective negotiations. This report is examining, with a comparative view, the knowledge and skills needed by trade unionists and workers representatives and the examples to improve that knowledge in several countries. Providing workers’ organisations with the proper skills to effectively address the challenges posed by digitalisation and datafication, thus contributing to fill a gap in the praxis of industrial relations, is the main rationale of the GDPiR-project. 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171198 [ES]Comentario de la STJUE del caso Österreichische Post, en la que el TJUE considera que el derecho a la protección de los datos personales no es un derecho absoluto y que, efectivamente, puede haber circunstancias en las que no sea posible facilitar información sobre destinatarios concretos, por lo que el derecho de acceso podrá limitarse a la información sobre las categorías de destinatarios cuando no sea posible comunicar la identidad de los destinatarios concretos, en particular, cuando estos aún no se conozcan. Ello está relacionado con el hecho de que, aun cuando sea un derecho del interesado, el responsable no está obligado a responder a solicitudes «manifiestamente infundadas o excesivas». Se comentan, además, otras dos decisiones del TJUE de 2023, los casos CRIF y Pankki, también en relación con el derecho de acceso. [EN]Commentary on the CJEU judgment in the Österreichische Post case, in which the CJEU held that the right to the protection of personal data is not absolute and that, indeed, there may be circumstances in which it is not possible to provide information about specific recipients. Therefore, the right of access may be limited to information about categories of recipients when it is not possible to communicate the identity of the specific recipients, particularly when these are not yet known. This is related to the fact that, even though it is a right of the data subject, the controller is not obliged to respond to "manifestly unfounded or excessive" requests. Two other CJEU decisions from 2023, the CRIF and Pankki cases, also concerning the right of access, are also discussed. 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171187 Introduction: School participation is central to learning, development, and inclusion. Within international efforts to identify environmental barriers to participation, this study aimed to analyze the school participation profile of students aged 5–17 years in Spain—with and without disabilities and other special educational needs (SEN)—and to identify environmental factors that support or hinder their participation. Method: Parents of 415 Spanish students aged 5–17 years completed the Spanish version of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth: PEM-CY. Group differences between children with (n=142) and without (n=273) disabilities were tested. Results: Students with disabilities/SEN participated less often and with lower involvement across all school activities, with significant differences in “Classroom activities” and “Getting together with peers outside of class.” Parents of children with disabilities reported that cognitive, behavioral, and social demands commonly hinder participation. Reported resource unavailability ranged from 10%–38% (adapted transportation, financial resources, information, technical/ communication aids, and support services tailored to students’ needs and interests). Conversely, 44.4%–72.8% of parents indicated that physical layout, sensory qualities, safety conditions, staff attitudes, and peer relationships usually supported participation. Discussion: Despite inclusive-education mandates, findings indicate persistent participation and engagement inequities for students with disabilities and other special needs in Spanish schools. Parents point to environmental conditions— support services tailored to students’ needs and interests, teacher training to individualize these supports, and a culture of collaboration among teachers and between teachers, families, and children with special needs themselves—as key elements in ensuring meaningful, equitable, and full participation in school life. 2026-03-26T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171185 [ES]Para que un tratamiento de datos personales basado en el consentimiento del interesado sea lícito es necesario que dicho la manifestación de voluntad sea libre, inequívoca, específica e informada. En ocasiones, la concurrencia de todos estos requisitos puede ponerse en duda, en particular cuando dicho consentimiento se obtiene en el marco de una relación negocial de manera única y global, de tal forma que la voluntad del consumidor o usuario-interesado sirve simultáneamente para perfeccionar el contrato y autorizar el tratamiento. No parece admisible, en tales casos, que la celebración y/o ejecución del contrato quede sujeta a la cesión de datos que no sean estrictamente necesarios para ello, pues de lo contrario el consentimiento a dicha cesión no sería, evidentemente, libre ni inequívoco. Ello puede apreciarse, sobre todo, en relación con la recogida de datos para publicidad comportamental, mediante herramientas como las cookies. De otra parte, el uso masivo de apps, dispositivos portátiles y wearables en la actualidad supone también un riesgo para la privacidad y la protección de datos derivado de la ausencia de conocimiento de los usuarios sobre los datos que se recogen; también a esta cuestión se dedican unas páginas en el presente estudio. [EN]Processing of personal data based on the consent of the data subject is only lawful if that consent is free, specific, unambiguous, specific and informed. On occasions, the concurrence of all these requirements can be questioned, particularly when the consent is obtained within the framework of a business relationship in a unique and global way, and is given by the consumer or user-data subject simultaneously to make the contract and authorize the treatment. It does not seem admissible, in such cases, for the conclusion and/or performance of the contract to be subject to the transfer of data that are not strictly necessary for this purpose; otherwise the consent to such transfer would obviously not be free and unequivocal. This can be seen, above all, in relation to the collection of data for behavioral advertising, through tools such as cookies. On the other hand, the massive use of apps, portable devices and wearables nowadays also poses a risk to privacy and data protection due to the lack of knowledge of users about the data collected; this issue is also the subject of a few pages in this study. 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171178 [ES]Análisis de la jurisprudencia de 2023 sobre propiedad intelectual en España. La mayoría de sentencias del TS y de las Audiencias ratifican líneas jurisprudenciales existentes sobre originalidad, valor del registro de la propiedad intelectual, derechos adquiridos o transmitidos sobre diferentes tipos de obras (colectivas, por encargo, edición...), los presupuestos de la compensación equitativa por copia privada o la legitimación de las entidades de gestión colectiva para actuar en juicio. De forma puntual, alguna Audiencia se enfrenta a cuestiones distintas, como el alcance de las licencias creative commons y similares, o la nueva configuración del derecho de participación como de gestión colectiva obligatoria. [EN]2023 has not been a particularly prolific or important year in terms of judicial decisions on intellectual property. The majority of rulings of the Supreme Court and the Provincial Courts ratify existing jurisprudential lines on originality, value of the intellectual property registry, rights acquired or transmitted on different types of works (collective, commissioned, edition...), the requirements of fair compensation for private copying, or the legitimacy of collective management organisations to act in court. Occasionally, some Provincial Courts face different issues, such as the scope of creative commons and similar licenses, or the new configuration of the resale right as mandatory collective management. 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z