Should We Use a Total Score, Two Subscale Scores, or Six Subscale Scores for the Self-Compassion Scale? A Multi-faceted Assessment Beyond Model Fit Indices

Abstract

[EN] Objectives The aim of this study was to conduct a multi-faceted assessment of the psychometric properties of the Self Compassion Scale (SCS). In addition to the goodness-of-ft, we aimed to assess the strength and replicability of three factorial solutions, and the quality and efectiveness of the three scoring schemes of the scale (i.e., total scale score, two subscale scores, and six subscale scores). Methods Participants were 1508 Spanish-speaking community-dwelling adults (M =34.94 years, SD=15.02). Data were examined by means of a conjoint strategy using Rasch modeling, non-linear factor analysis, exploratory bifactor analysis, and parallel analysis. A procedure for selecting the optimal set of items that must be used to compute individual’s scores was used.Results The unidimensional solution showed a marginal model ft (RMSR=.089), and both the bifactor two-group and bifactor six-group solutions showed a good ft (RMSR=.043 and .019, respectively). However, only the unidimensional and the bifactor two-factor solutions showed interpretable and replicable factor structures, and high-quality and efective scores to be used for measurement purposes. Subscale scores derived from the six primary factors did not show adequate psychometric properties. It was observed that the information provided by 10 items was redundant and had already been provided by the other 16 items. Conclusions Good model ft is neither sufcient nor necessary to justify the use of a scoring scheme. Goodness-of-ft statistics should be complemented by anassessment of the metric properties of the resulting scores when proposing SCS scoring schemes.