Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorVillegas Barahona, Greibin
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Nerea 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Ana Belén 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Barba, Mercedes 
dc.contributor.authorGalindo Villardón, Purificación 
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T09:50:55Z
dc.date.available2024-01-30T09:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationVillegas Barahona, G., González García, N., Sánchez García, A. B., Sánchez Barba, M., & Galindo Villardón, M. P. (2018). Seven methods to determine the dimensionality of tests: Application to the General Self-Efficacy Scale in twenty-six countries. Psicothema. 30 (4), 442-448.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0214-9915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/154999
dc.descriptionAgradecimiento: el artículo está publicado en la revista PSICOTHEMA [Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias] y está disponible en: https://redined.educacion.gob.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11162/174752/442-448.pdf?sequence=1es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN]Background: One of the most important concepts within Cognitive Social Theory as framed by Bandura is the perceived self-effi cacy; this concept became widespread in 1981 when Mathias Jerusalem and Ralf Schwarzer, using 10 items, established a one-dimensional and universal construct of this scale. The main purpose of this study is to show that the General SelfEffi cacy Scale (GSE) is not a one-dimensional and universal construct, as is currently assumed. Method: The data from 19,719 people from 26 countries were analyzed. In order to identify and understand invariance we applied seven multivariate statistical techniques. Results: The fi ndings suggest the existence of a multidimensional structure and differential item functioning by country. Insofar as there is differential item functioning by country and it is not possible to universalize it, and there are several items on the scale that statistically constitute additional factors. The results confi rm that the self-effi cacy construct is neither universal nor unidimensional. Conclusions: A psychometric instrument must be valued and used with great care; the one in question is being used in a generalized way.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherColegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Asturiases_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyes_ES
dc.subjectItem Response Theoryes_ES
dc.subjectDimensionalityes_ES
dc.subjectCross-cultural comparisonses_ES
dc.subjectInvariancees_ES
dc.titleSeven methods to determine the dimensionality of tests: application to the General Self-Effi cacy Scale in twenty-six countries.es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.113es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.7334/psicothema2018.113
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1886-144X
dc.journal.titlePsicothemaes_ES
dc.volume.number30es_ES
dc.issue.number4es_ES
dc.page.initial442es_ES
dc.page.final448es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional