Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorOssa, Carlos J.
dc.contributor.authorFernández Rivas, Silvia 
dc.contributor.authorSaiz Sánchez, Carlos 
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T12:13:11Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T12:13:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationOssa CJ, Rivas SF and Saiz C (2023) Relation between metacognitive strategies, motivation to think, and critical thinking skills. Front. Psychol. 14:1272958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272958es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/155835
dc.description.abstract[EN] Critical thinking is a complex reasoning skill, and even though it is hard to reach a consensus on its definition, there is agreement on it being an eminently cognitive skill. It is strongly related with reflective and metacognitive skills, as well as attitudinal or motivational aspects, although no model has yet been able to integrate these three elements. We present herein the preliminary results of a study seeking to establish these relations, in a sample of Chilean university students. 435 students from three universities participated, of which 88 were men, 333 were women, and 14 did not indicate their gender. Their ages ranges between 18 and 51  years old (M  =  21, SD  =  3.09). Three instruments were applied, one to measure metacognitive strategies, one to measure motivation to critical thinking, and a third to measure critical thinking skills. The relation was analyzed via structural equations. The results show a positive, strong, and significant relation between metacognition and motivation to think. However, only a weak significant relation was observed between motivation to think and critical thinking, and no direct relation was found between metacognition and critical thinking. We hypothesize a significant but moderate relation between the variables, where metacognition influences motivation to think, which in turn influences critical thinking skills. Factors are discussed which could negatively affect the studied relations, as well as the importance of generating integrated models between the three variables, as they would show a theoretical and empirical link.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontierses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCritical thinkinges_ES
dc.subjectStructural modelses_ES
dc.subjectCognitiones_ES
dc.subjectMotivationes_ES
dc.subjectPedagogyes_ES
dc.titleRelation between metacognitive strategies, motivation to think, and critical thinking skillses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272958/fulles_ES
dc.subject.unesco61 Psicologíaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272958/full
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Psychologyes_ES
dc.volume.number14es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional