Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGálvez García, Germán 
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Javiera
dc.contributor.authorAlbayay, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Henri
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-03T11:29:27Z
dc.date.available2024-05-03T11:29:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0022-2895
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/157636
dc.description.abstract[EN]We investigated the extent to which a complex finger sequence impacts on hand switching costs in a sequential action. Response component latencies (premotor, motor, and movement) were compared in no-switch (same finger per formed the action of pressing and reaching) and switch condi tions (pressing with one finger and completing the reaching action with the homologous finger from the other hand). Results showed that the switch condition presented longer latency for premotor and movement components. For the motor compo nent, however, switch condition was faster. This expands the previous literature investigating switching costs using simple finger movements in more complex tasks. A mechanical expla nation of the interplay between response subcomponents is pro vided to explain the inversion of response pattern for the motor component.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectHand switching costes_ES
dc.subjectMotor response componentses_ES
dc.subjectSequential movementses_ES
dc.titleHand Switching Costs are not Uniform Across Response Componentses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionWe investigated the extent to which a complex finger sequence impacts on hand switching costs in a sequential action. Response component latencies (premotor, motor, and movement) were compared in no-switch (same finger per formed the action of pressing and reaching) and switch condi tions (pressing with one finger and completing the reaching action with the homologous finger from the other hand). Results showed that the switch condition presented longer latency for premotor and movement components. For the motor compo nent, however, switch condition was faster. This expands the previous literature investigating switching costs using simple finger movements in more complex tasks. A mechanical expla nation of the interplay between response subcomponents is pro vided to explain the inversion of response pattern for the motor component.es_ES
dc.subject.unesco61 Psicologíaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00222895.2018.1454399
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1940-1027
dc.journal.titleJournal of Motor Behaviores_ES
dc.volume.number51es_ES
dc.issue.number3es_ES
dc.page.initial239es_ES
dc.page.final244es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional