Compartir
Título
Skull vibration-induced nystagmus and high frequency ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in superior canal dehiscence
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Superior canal dehiscence
Skull vibration-induced nystagmus
SVINT
Ocular vestibularevoked myogenic potentials
HFoVEMPS
Vestibular disorders
Clasificación UNESCO
2411.13 Fisiología de la Audición
2201.03 Física de la Audición
Fecha de publicación
2022
Editor
MDPI
Citación
Batuecas-Caletrío, Á., Jara, A., Suarez-Vega, V. M., Marcos-Alonso, S., Sánchez-Gómez, H., & Pérez-Fernández, N. (2022). Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus and High Frequency Ocular Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Superior Canal Dehiscence. Audiology Research, 12(2), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.3390/AUDIOLRES12020023
Resumen
[EN]Abstract: Background: Although diagnostic criteria have been established for superior canal dehiscence syndrome, cases in which the diagnosis is not easy are frequent. On those occasions, some tests
such as vibration-induced nystagmus or vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials can offer invaluable
help due to their high sensitivity and specificity. Methods: We studied 30 patients showing superior
canal dehiscence or “near-dehiscence” in a CT scan. Skull vibration-induced nystagmus and high
frequency ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials are performed in each patient. The aim
of the study is to determine how useful both tests are for detection of superior canal dehiscence
or near-dehiscence. Results: Of the 60 temporal bones studied, no dehiscence was the result in
22, near-dehiscence in 17 and a definite finding in 21. In 10/30 patients, there was no SVIN (Skull
vibration induced nystagmus) during otoneurological testing, while in 6/30, induced nystagmus was
mainly horizontal, and in 14/30 there was vertical up-beating. All patients had a positive oVEMP
(Ocular vestibular evoked myiogenic potentials) at 0.5 kHz in both ears and the HFoVEMP (High
frequency ocular vestibular evoked myiogenic potentials) response was positive in 25/60 (41.6%) of
the ears studied and in 19/30 of the patients evaluated (in 6 it was positive in both ears). Up-beat
SVIN will point to a SCD (Superior Canal Dehiscence) mainly when HFoVEMP are present, and
when this is negative there is a high probability that it is not a SCD. Conclusions: When SVIN and
HFoVEMP results are added (or combined), they not only improve the possibilities of detecting SCD,
but also the affected side.
URI
DOI
10.3390/audiolres12020023
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones












