Dokumentanzeige
- Gredos Startseite
- Wissenschaftliches Repository
- Departamentos
- Ciencias Sociales
- Departamento Psicología Básica, Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
- DPBPMCC. Artículos del Departamento de Psicología Básica, Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
- Dokumentanzeige
- Gredos Startseite
- Wissenschaftliches Repository
- Departamentos
- Ciencias Sociales
- Departamento Psicología Básica, Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
- DPBPMCC. Artículos del Departamento de Psicología Básica, Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
- Dokumentanzeige
Compartir
Título
Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First‐Episode Psychosis and Their First‐Degree Relatives
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
Cognition
Endophenotypes
First- episode psychosis
Motor dexterity
Relatives
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders
Clasificación UNESCO
61 Psicología
Fecha de publicación
2025
Editor
Wiley
Citación
M. Sevilla-Ramos, V. Ladera, R. García-García, and R. Ayesa-Arriola, “ Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis and Their First-Degree Relatives,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 152, no. 3 (2025): 216–227, https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13821.
Resumen
[EN]Introduction: Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first-episode
psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first-degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity.
Methods: The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first-degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls.
Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual
memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to
Z-scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of
covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models
examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group.
Results: There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test (F = 16.25, p < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26)
and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group
also scored lowest on other cognitive tests (p < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved
Pegboard performance was found in all groups (β = 0.47–0.84, p < 0.001). Group-specific associations with age, sex, education,
intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic
liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic
interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.
URI
ISSN
0001-690X
DOI
10.1111/acps.13821
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones












