Compartir
Título
Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound‐guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro‐physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
Autor(es)
Palabras clave
USGET
Galvanic
Electrolysis
Treatment
Patellar
Tendinopathy
Electrophysiotherapy
Electrólisis Ecoguiada
Tratamiento
Tendinopatía
Electrofisioterapia
Fecha de publicación
2016
Editor
https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4
Resumen
Background: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can
be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose
of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined
with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to
treat patellar tendinopathy.
Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30)
received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group
2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments
of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis
of means and a survival study were performed.
Results: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in
each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P
< 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9
to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were
statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon
completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean
number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1
was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant.
Conclusion: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes
than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.
URI
ISSN
2197-1153
DOI
10.1186/S40634-016-0070-4
Versión del editor
Aparece en las colecciones
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
Nombre:
2016_Randomized controlled trial comparing.pdfEmbargado hasta: 2099-09-09
Tamaño:
520.3Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF













