Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorPeña García, Paz
dc.contributor.authorJaime de Aza, Mayeli
dc.contributor.authorFeltrero, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-15T08:59:54Z
dc.date.available2026-04-15T08:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2026-03
dc.identifier.citationPeña-García, P., Jaime-de-Aza, M., & Feltrero, R. (2026). Dialogic reflection and algorithmic bias: pathways toward inclusive AI in education. Trends in Higher Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu5010009es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/170992
dc.description.abstract[EN]Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems typically inherit biases from their training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes that undermine equity and inclusion. This issue is particularly significant when popular Generative AI (GAI) applications are used in educational contexts. To respond to this challenge, the study evaluates the effectiveness of dialogic reflection-based training for educators in identifying and mitigating biases in AI. Furthermore, it considers how these sessions contribute to the advancement of algorithmic justice and inclusive practices. A key component of the proposed training methodology involved equipping educators with the skills to design inclusive prompts—specific instructions or queries aimed at minimizing bias in AI outputs. This approach not only raised awareness of algorithmic inequities but also provided practical strategies for educators to actively contribute to fairer AI systems. A qualitative analysis of the course’s Moodle forum interactions was conducted with 102 university professors and graduate students from diverse regions of the Dominican Republic. Participants engaged in interactive activities, debates, and practical exercises addressing AI bias, algorithmic justice, and ethical implications. Responses were analyzed using Atlas.ti across five categories: participation quality, bias identification strategies, ethical responsibility, social impact, and equity proposals. The training methodology emphasized collaborative learning through real case analyses and the co-construction of knowledge. The study contributes a hypothesis-driven model linking dialogic reflection, bias awareness, and inclusive teaching, offering a replicable framework for ethical AI integration in higher education.en_EN
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence in educationen_EN
dc.subjectAI bias mitigationen_EN
dc.subjectDialogic reflectionen_EN
dc.subjectAI bias awareness trainingen_EN
dc.subjectAlgorithmic justiceen_EN
dc.subjectInclusive AI practicesen_EN
dc.subject.meshEducation *
dc.subject.meshSocial Justice *
dc.subject.meshSocial Discrimination *
dc.subject.meshEthics *
dc.titleDialogic reflection and algorithmic bias: pathways toward inclusive AI in educationen_EN
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu5010009es_ES
dc.subject.unesco1203.04 Inteligencia Artificiales_ES
dc.subject.unesco6112.01 Discriminaciónes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/higheredu5010009
dc.relation.projectIDRamón y Cajal programme/MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/RYC2024-049375es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2813-4346
dc.journal.titleTrends in Higher Educationes_ES
dc.volume.number5es_ES
dc.issue.number1es_ES
dc.page.initial9es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decsjusticia social *
dc.subject.decsdiscriminación social *
dc.subject.decseducación *
dc.subject.decsética *


Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional