Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuadilla González, Yasmina 
dc.contributor.authorBenito Garzón, Lorena 
dc.contributor.authorQuispe López, Norberto 
dc.contributor.authorMontero Martín, Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T09:05:33Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T09:05:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGuadilla Y, Benito-Garzón L, Quispe-López N, Montero J. Histologic Outcomes of the Use of Different Biomaterials for Socket Regeneration in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Sep-Oct;37(5):1026-1036. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9422. PMID: 36170317.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/164083
dc.description.abstract[EN]To analyze the quality of bone regeneration in fresh sockets using four different materials at different time points. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the histologic and histomorphometric characteristics of 82 fresh sockets from 30 patients. One socket per patient healed spontaneously (control), and at least one fresh socket was grafted with a material chosen randomly from a sealed envelope: plateletrich growth factor (PRGF; n = 20 sites), PRGF + autologous bone (n = 9 sockets), autologous bone (n = 10 sites), or PRGF + demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA; n = 13). Biopsy specimens were taken at different time points divided into three assessment groups: short duration (2 to 4 months), intermediate duration (5 to 6 months), and long duration (7 to 12 months). The histologic findings were assessed to quantify the trabeculae pattern, the degree of mineralization, and the quality of bone regeneration. A total of 26 patients with 73 sockets completed the study. Mineralization after a short duration was found to be significantly higher among sockets treated only with autologous bone (47.3% ± 3.6%) or with PRGF+autologous bone (45.1% ± 13.6%). During the intermediate time point, this difference was not observed; also, the control sites were found to have the highest amount of mineralization (37.7% ± 14.9%). After a long duration of wound healing, the PRGF+DFDBA group had the greatest percentage of mineralized tissue (54.7% ± 28.7%), which was significantly higher than the sites treated only with PRGF (30.0% ± 13.2%). From a histologic point of view, the use of autologous graft with or without PRGF seems to be the best strategy for socket regeneration within a short period of time (2 to 4 months). However, the application of PRGF alone inside fresh sockets may interfere with normal bone healing compared with control sites healed spontaneously.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherQuintessencees_ES
dc.subjectalveolar ridge preservationes_ES
dc.subjectBone healinges_ES
dc.subjectHistologyes_ES
dc.subjectPlatelet-rich plasmaes_ES
dc.subject.meshTooth Extraction *
dc.subject.meshMouth *
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantation *
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible Materials *
dc.titleHistologic Outcomes of the Use of Different Biomaterials for Socket Regeneration in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/ 10.11607/jomi.9422es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.9422
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.pmid36170317
dc.identifier.essn1942-4434
dc.journal.titleThe International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial implantses_ES
dc.volume.number37es_ES
dc.issue.number5es_ES
dc.page.initial1026es_ES
dc.page.final1036es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.decsalveolo dental *
dc.subject.decsmateriales biocompatibles *
dc.subject.decshumanos *
dc.subject.decsboca *
dc.subject.decsextracción dental *
dc.subject.decstrasplante de hueso *


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record