• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
  • Contacto
  • Sugerencias
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Gredos. Repositorio documental de la Universidad de SalamancaUniversidad de Salamanca
    Consorcio BUCLE Recolector

    Listar

    Todo GredosComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresMateriasTítulosEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresMateriasTítulos

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso
    Estadísticas totales de uso y lectura

    ENLACES Y ACCESOS

    Derechos de autorPolíticasGuías de autoarchivoFAQAdhesión USAL a la Declaración de BerlínProtocolo de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datosSolicitud de depósito, modificación y retirada de documentos y datos

    COMPARTIR

    Ver ítem 
    •   Gredos Principal
    • Repositorio Científico
    • Grupos de Investigación
    • GIASO. Avances en Salud Oral
    • GIASO. Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   Gredos Principal
    • Repositorio Científico
    • Grupos de Investigación
    • GIASO. Avances en Salud Oral
    • GIASO. Artículos
    • Ver ítem

    Compartir

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Título
    Histologic Outcomes of the Use of Different Biomaterials for Socket Regeneration in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Autor(es)
    Guadilla González, YasminaAutoridad USAL ORCID
    Benito Garzón, LorenaAutoridad USAL ORCID
    Quispe López, NorbertoAutoridad USAL ORCID
    Montero Martín, JavierAutoridad USAL ORCID
    Palabras clave
    alveolar ridge preservation
    Bone healing
    Histology
    Platelet-rich plasma
    Fecha de publicación
    2022
    Editor
    Quintessence
    Citación
    Guadilla Y, Benito-Garzón L, Quispe-López N, Montero J. Histologic Outcomes of the Use of Different Biomaterials for Socket Regeneration in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Sep-Oct;37(5):1026-1036. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9422. PMID: 36170317.
    Resumen
    [EN]To analyze the quality of bone regeneration in fresh sockets using four different materials at different time points. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the histologic and histomorphometric characteristics of 82 fresh sockets from 30 patients. One socket per patient healed spontaneously (control), and at least one fresh socket was grafted with a material chosen randomly from a sealed envelope: plateletrich growth factor (PRGF; n = 20 sites), PRGF + autologous bone (n = 9 sockets), autologous bone (n = 10 sites), or PRGF + demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA; n = 13). Biopsy specimens were taken at different time points divided into three assessment groups: short duration (2 to 4 months), intermediate duration (5 to 6 months), and long duration (7 to 12 months). The histologic findings were assessed to quantify the trabeculae pattern, the degree of mineralization, and the quality of bone regeneration. A total of 26 patients with 73 sockets completed the study. Mineralization after a short duration was found to be significantly higher among sockets treated only with autologous bone (47.3% ± 3.6%) or with PRGF+autologous bone (45.1% ± 13.6%). During the intermediate time point, this difference was not observed; also, the control sites were found to have the highest amount of mineralization (37.7% ± 14.9%). After a long duration of wound healing, the PRGF+DFDBA group had the greatest percentage of mineralized tissue (54.7% ± 28.7%), which was significantly higher than the sites treated only with PRGF (30.0% ± 13.2%). From a histologic point of view, the use of autologous graft with or without PRGF seems to be the best strategy for socket regeneration within a short period of time (2 to 4 months). However, the application of PRGF alone inside fresh sockets may interfere with normal bone healing compared with control sites healed spontaneously.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10366/164083
    ISSN
    0882-2786
    DOI
    10.11607/jomi.9422
    Versión del editor
    https://doi.org/ 10.11607/jomi.9422
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • GIASO. Artículos [31]
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros en el ítem
    Nombre:
    JOMI_37_5_Guadilla_1026.pdf
    Tamaño:
    376.5Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir
     
    Universidad de Salamanca
    AVISO LEGAL Y POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDAD
    2024 © UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA
     
    Universidad de Salamanca
    AVISO LEGAL Y POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDAD
    2024 © UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA